2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of plasma exposed spin-on-glass (SOG) and polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) surfaces and their impact on bond strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bonding parameters are optimized using an algorithm developed by Bhattacharya et al (2006) For estimating an optimum bonding strategy the plasma dosages are varied and the surface hydrophilicity values are checked for different samples exposed to Oxygen plasma for different times (using surface contact angle). The contact angle values of various surfaces are measured and the time for which this goes below 10°is found.…”
Section: Design Of Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bonding parameters are optimized using an algorithm developed by Bhattacharya et al (2006) For estimating an optimum bonding strategy the plasma dosages are varied and the surface hydrophilicity values are checked for different samples exposed to Oxygen plasma for different times (using surface contact angle). The contact angle values of various surfaces are measured and the time for which this goes below 10°is found.…”
Section: Design Of Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Even though a freshly prepared NPS surface is more hydrophobic than bare Si (water contact angle > 95 ), 19 it is quite sensitive to air, and thus wafer annealing after NPS formation promotes growth of SiO2 on a top of the NPS substrate. The NPS surface formed by electrochemical anodization and subsequent annealing maintains hydrophilic property for a longer period of time than the conventional O2 plasma-based surface modification, 20 and has a relatively high surface free energy due to the increased hydrophilicity. 21 A macroporous silicon (MPS, pore diameter = 2 μm and pore depth = 10 μm) layer was unfavorable for direct deposition of PPy (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developing surface behaviour can be explained by the accumulation of the embedded molecules at the PDMS surface. The rapidly decreasing contact angle during the measurement indicates the increasing surface concentration of the modifying molecules at the PDMS / liquid interface [33,34,35]. The long term stability of the developed molecule layers were reported more than months by [11,12].…”
Section: Effect Of Surface Modification On Hydrophilicitymentioning
confidence: 97%