1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-3124-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

37
1,679
3
38

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,409 publications
(1,851 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
37
1,679
3
38
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the theoretical prediction that a freestanding ultrathin graphene sheet is prone to rolling up to form a tubular structure 40 . Scrolling of a sheet-like material is known to enhance the elastic stiffness remarkably 22 . Thus, the fibrous structure resulted from self scrolling of single or few layers of graphene helps maintain elasticity and structural integrity as well when the density of the graphene monolith becomes extremely low.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with the theoretical prediction that a freestanding ultrathin graphene sheet is prone to rolling up to form a tubular structure 40 . Scrolling of a sheet-like material is known to enhance the elastic stiffness remarkably 22 . Thus, the fibrous structure resulted from self scrolling of single or few layers of graphene helps maintain elasticity and structural integrity as well when the density of the graphene monolith becomes extremely low.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superelasticity that has been observed in foams made of carbon-based tubular or fibrillar nanostructures [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] has not been achieved in foams solely based on graphene sheets. Indeed, as the specific elastic bending stiffness of a sheet-like structure is known to be intrinsically inferior to that of its tubular or fibrillar counterparts 22 , previous analysis 13 suggests that it would be highly challenging to realize superelasticity in graphene foams. The ability to maintain structural integrity upon large deformation for graphene monoliths is not only crucial for building new types of flexible electronic devices, such as batteries, supercapacitors, sensors and actuators, but also important for future development of carbon-based biological tissue scaffolds and ultralight cellular materials for mechanical damping and thermal/acoustic insulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical properties of the three plates that were chosen are given in Table 2. SS25 and SS60 had a similar Young's modulus (E) whereas the polyurethane (PU) surface had a different Young's modulus. However, the flexural rigidity (Gere and Timoshenko, 1990), which characterizes the bending stiffness of a plate, was of the same order of magnitude for both SS25 and PU (Table 2).…”
Section: Foot Support Surfacementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The Flexural Rigidity (EI) (Gere and Timoshenko, 1990) that characterizes the resistance to bending was computed from the Young's Modulus (E) and the second moment of area (I) ( Table 2) by:…”
Section: Materials Property Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition to a nonlinear regime is predicted by elasticity theory and can be ascribed to the onset of sizable local deformations originating from the finite size and shape of the indenter. [16][17][18] Importantly, even for large deflections of 50 nm (corresponding to strains of ∼1%), the loading and unloading curves were observed to overlap, indicating fully elastic deformations under these conditions. Further evidence for the excellent resilience of the sheets derives from the fact that the slope of the F(δ) curves does not change after repeated deformations, which proves the absence of permanent damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%