1994
DOI: 10.1080/13510349408403385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanics of change: Social movements, transnational coalitions, and the transformation processes in Eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…She found, however, that while this was true for some cases, in East Germany and Czechoslovakia where national civil societies were comparatively weak, there were strong connections to transnational coalitions (Chilton 1995:206). A capacity to form transnational coalitions in these cases was not dependent upon previous levels of (national) civil society development, and it was the ability to engage in transnational coalitions that led to the transformations of these societies (Chilton 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She found, however, that while this was true for some cases, in East Germany and Czechoslovakia where national civil societies were comparatively weak, there were strong connections to transnational coalitions (Chilton 1995:206). A capacity to form transnational coalitions in these cases was not dependent upon previous levels of (national) civil society development, and it was the ability to engage in transnational coalitions that led to the transformations of these societies (Chilton 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domestic organizations can contact, communicate, and partner with transnational NGOs, many of which established a visible presence in these societies; and they can look to foreign-based foundations and NGOs, as well as international and supranational agencies, for financial support and non-monetary resources in the form of organizational transfer of skills, knowledge, and information (Bach & Stark, 2002). Thus, at the same time that East Central Europe's fragile civic organizations were sinking their roots into the domestic societybuilding ties to their members and constituents as well as to other organizations -they were also building transnational ties to actors outside the country (Chilton, 1995). Are Hungarian civic associations becoming uprooted just at the moment when they might be establishing strong ties to society or are there patterns of transnationalization that can co-exist with the reproduction of domestic integration?…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Yet lack of material and cognitive resources may hamper resort; other domestic factors may also constrain, such as 'inherited institutions and ideologies' and 'belief structures' (Marks and McAdam 1996: 258). In such cases, domestic NGOs, to be rendered capable of exploiting their opportunities, may depend on transnational norm entrepreneurs and advocacy networks (Chilton 1995;Keck and Sikkink 1998;della Porta and Tarrow 2005) bound together by shared beliefs and values (Keck and Sikkink 1998). Such networks mobilise resources in support of domestic groups and 'pressure policy-makers to initiate change by increasing the costs of certain strategy options' (Bo¨rzel and Risse 2000: 9).…”
Section: The Eu Transnational Network and Domestic Changementioning
confidence: 99%