2010
DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2009.001651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical thrombectomy with the penumbra system for treatment of venous sinus thrombosis

Abstract: Endovascular treatment for venous sinus thrombosis with the PS is a safe and efficacious alternative to the other forms of mechanical thrombectomy reported in the literature. Good clinical and radiographic results can be obtained without the need for chemical thrombolysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only anecdotal evidence for its efficacy is available. 212 The risks associated with use of the Penumbra System for cerebral venous thrombosis are likely similar to those seen with the Merci and AngioJet systems.…”
Section: Mechanical Thrombectomy/thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Only anecdotal evidence for its efficacy is available. 212 The risks associated with use of the Penumbra System for cerebral venous thrombosis are likely similar to those seen with the Merci and AngioJet systems.…”
Section: Mechanical Thrombectomy/thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Both the Penumbra aspiration system and the Solitaire FR device have been used separately for the treatment of CVST 10 11. However, none of the reported cases clearly demonstrates the benefit of either device for impeding fatal herniation with septal shift and avoidance of decompressive hemicraniectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device has a soft catheter allowing distal catheterization and at the same time it has an option for aspiration. Successful use of this device for recanalization in the cases of ATCVS, as reflected in the individual publications in recent years [18][19][20]22 allows us to suggest wider use of this safe and effective method of mechanical thrombus extraction in the near future.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%