2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-021-05771-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and low baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score: a multicenter retrospective matched analysis

Abstract: Background and PurposeThe benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) and baseline mild neurological symptoms remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MT in this subgroup of patients. Methods The databases of 9 high-volume Italian stroke centers were retrospectively screened for patients with LVO in the anterior circulation and a baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we found that the significant association of eosinophils with SAP/poor outcome was independent of general anesthesia in the multivariate analysis (SAP: OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00-0.38; P = 0.0263; poor outcome: OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00-0.10; P = 0.0091) when general anesthesia was included as confounding factors, which did not change the main results of our study. In addition, further studies from other samples of patients with AIS are needed to validate our results (Alexandre et al, 2021a , b ). Fourth, our study was designed to be cross-sectional; therefore, causality cannot be established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Nevertheless, we found that the significant association of eosinophils with SAP/poor outcome was independent of general anesthesia in the multivariate analysis (SAP: OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00-0.38; P = 0.0263; poor outcome: OR, 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00-0.10; P = 0.0091) when general anesthesia was included as confounding factors, which did not change the main results of our study. In addition, further studies from other samples of patients with AIS are needed to validate our results (Alexandre et al, 2021a , b ). Fourth, our study was designed to be cross-sectional; therefore, causality cannot be established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Unfortunately, the specific distribution of border zone infarcts was not available for the majority of studies which we included in our systematic review. Because of the relatively low frequency of large vessel occlusion, it is expected that clinically severe strokes and need for emergent endovascular treatment [14] are infrequent in these patients. This was demonstrated in the study by Tennenbaum et al, in…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time from LKW to END occurrence was shorter in patients who had EVT (median 6.7 h [IQR, 4.0-12.2] when compared to a median of 26.2 h (16-39), [41-44] in those who were treated (P-for-difference, <0.01). The NIHSS at END occurrence was a median of 9 (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13) in those who received EVT and a median of 7 (4-10) in medically managed patients (P-for-difference, 0.27). In the multivariable logistic regression model in which the location of occlusion was mutually exclusive, the presence of extracranial ICA occlusion (adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI [1.09-2.73]), presence of tandem occlusion (adjusted OR, 2.79 [1.57-4.95]), history of hypertension (adjusted OR, 1.49 [1.03-2.14]) and a higher NIHSS (adjusted OR 1.12 per 1-point increase, [1.02-1.23]) were significantly associated with higher odds of END occurrence (for full results, see Supplementary Table III).…”
Section: Early Neurological Deteriorationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent observational studies have reported that EVT may be associated with increased hemorrhagic complications and no overall clinical benefit in these patients (4)(5)(6). However, other observational studies have suggested potential benefits of EVT in these patients (7)(8)(9)(10)(11). More robust evidence from large high-quality registries is needed to help physicians make treatment decisions in these patients until ongoing trials present their results in a few years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%