1986
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1986.4334580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Stress Dependence of Radiation Effects in MOS Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On its turn, this effect can be compensated by the introduction of a strained Si channel. As shown earlier [2], the strain will not only affect the mobility, but it will also influence the radiation behavior of the device. Total dose effects in triple gate devices have recently been reported [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…On its turn, this effect can be compensated by the introduction of a strained Si channel. As shown earlier [2], the strain will not only affect the mobility, but it will also influence the radiation behavior of the device. Total dose effects in triple gate devices have recently been reported [3], [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast to the reported stress dependence of the nMOSFET threshold voltage shift under irradiation [14], both applied tensile and compressive uniaxial stress reduce the threshold voltage shifts in devices with and dielectrics in Fig. 5 that are either irradiated under bias, or subjected only to bias stress without irradiation, for comparison.…”
Section: A Radiation Induced Threshold Voltage Shifts Under Mechanicmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Hole trapping is observed to be dominant in [11], [12] dielectric layers, similar to [13]. The effects of mechanical stress on the ionizing radiation response of -based MOS devices have been reported [14], [15], but the mechanical stress ( 4 MPa) produced in these studies by changing the gate electrode thickness is much smaller than that used in strained-Si technology ( 1 GPa).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In particular, it has been shown that in a symmetric layout, the stresses from adjacent STI edges (STI space) are added to the original STI stress [7,14]. For narrow devices where the STI spacing is smaller, there is more compressive stress, which results in variations in both doping concentration and amount of charge trapping [17,18]. In addition, random dopant fluctuations that result from variations in the implanted impurity concentration can also lead to variability in the as-processed device leakage [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Comparison Of Off-state Leakage Current Variations For Diffementioning
confidence: 99%