2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical strength of repairs of the hip piriformis tendon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such case, the quality of the reinsertion is conditioned by the bone quality [10]. White reports a rate of 0.9% of trochanteric fracture-avulsion with a satisfactory rate of dislocation (0.7%) [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In such case, the quality of the reinsertion is conditioned by the bone quality [10]. White reports a rate of 0.9% of trochanteric fracture-avulsion with a satisfactory rate of dislocation (0.7%) [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is a postural muscle, fatigue-resistant and containing a great quantity of slow muscular fibres (56%) [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that repair of the piriformis with the other short rotators and the capsule after posterior approach for THR reduces post-operative rates of dislocation by approximately 50%, 2,19-22 even though a significant proportion of these repairs may fail. 1,[23][24][25] Whether the reduction in the incidence of dislocation is due to mechanical restraint or proprioception is unclear. It has also been calculated that at 90° of hip flexion piriformis acts as an internal rotator of the hip, 19,26 but in this position the role of piriformis as a restraint to medial rotation is lost.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was assumed that the fracture surface was completely broken and in a contact state. The friction coefficient was 0.2 according to a previous study (7). The femur was subjected to numerous loads, including muscle force, joint force and dynamic impact force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%