1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90437-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of trabecular bone in the human mandible: Implications for dental implant treatment planning and surgical placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
213
1
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
17
213
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In models ''with PDL,'' the same material properties as for the TMJ soft tissue were assigned. In most models (models 3-13), the cancellous bone tissue material had values of E ¼ 56 MPa and m ¼ 0.3 based on measurements of cancellous bone tissue in the human mandibular corpus (Misch et al, 1999), but in two models (models 1 and 2) E was 560 MPa, which is more similar to measured values in the human mandibular condyles (Giesen et al, 2001). We did not perform a validation against experimental data for this particular model, but did so for a similar voxel-based FE model of another human mandible with isotropic and homogenous material properties (Gr€ oning et al, 2009, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In models ''with PDL,'' the same material properties as for the TMJ soft tissue were assigned. In most models (models 3-13), the cancellous bone tissue material had values of E ¼ 56 MPa and m ¼ 0.3 based on measurements of cancellous bone tissue in the human mandibular corpus (Misch et al, 1999), but in two models (models 1 and 2) E was 560 MPa, which is more similar to measured values in the human mandibular condyles (Giesen et al, 2001). We did not perform a validation against experimental data for this particular model, but did so for a similar voxel-based FE model of another human mandible with isotropic and homogenous material properties (Gr€ oning et al, 2009, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Hounsfield value for alveolar bone in the human jaw ranges from >0 and 850> Hounsfield [17,18]. The bone formation was consistent regardless of gender, age, age group or the diameter of the implant the graft was placed around.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This proposal is compatible with the different bone densities reported in previous studies for different sites in humans. 16,28 Nevertheless, Table 2. Indication of MI' length to be used in different sites in the maxilla and mandible, based on the cortical bone thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone quality usually varies according to the site in the arch; however, in the anterior region, bone density is greater than that in the median and posterior regions. 16 The stability of MIs is greater when cortical bone thickness is > 1 mm, 5 but is unaffected by bone density when cortical bone thickness is 1 mm. 14 Many variables can affect the stability of MIs.…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 98%