Bone Forming Potential of An-Organic Bovine Bone Graft: A Cone Beam CT study

Uzbek, Usman Haider

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2014/8557.5352

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 21 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both radiographic and histological results demonstrated the effectiveness of the osteoinductive allograft in forming new bone which is consistent with previous studies using similar graft materials, demonstrating the osteoinductive ability of xenograft when used as the sole grafting material in maxillary sinus augmentation [ 35 , 36 ]. Histologically xenograft was shown to form new trabecular bone and gain satisfactory results in terms of bone height that prove that it is a suitable augmenting material for atrophic maxillary rehabilitation [ 37 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bahaa-Eldin¹,

Mostafa²,

Nasry³

et al. 2017

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND:Various attempts have been implemented using different materials and techniques to augment the maxillary sinus floor for prospect dental implant positioning.AIM:This contemplate was conducted to assess the osteogenic capability of the maxillary sinus in a two-step sinus membrane elevation using titanium mesh to keep the formed space to place dental implants in atrophic ridges.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Titanium micromesh was customized and positioned into the sinus on one side to preserve the elevated membrane in position. On the other side xenograft was applied. Instant and 6-months postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done to assess the gained bone height and density. Bone core biopsies were obtained during implant placement for histological and histomorphometric evaluation.RESULTS:The average bone height values increased in both groups. Meanwhile the average bone density value was higher at the graft group than the titanium mesh group. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation presented the average bone volume of the newly formed bone in the graft group which is superior to that of the titanium mesh group.CONCLUSION:The use of the titanium micromesh as a space-maintaining device after Schneiderian membrane elevation is a trustworthy technique to elevate the floor of the sinus without grafting.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bahaa-Eldin¹,

Mostafa²,

Nasry³

et al. 2017

Open Access Maced J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[18], didn't have signifi cant results in relation to age. Similar fi ndings show Uzbeck, et al [30], in their CBCT study With respect to the gender of the patients, there was a slight increase in women being not statistically signifi cant.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Bone Quality Obtained in Sinus Lifting with Anorganic Bovine Bone. A CBCT Study

Melisa¹,

Constanza²,

Carlos³

2020

Int J Oral Craniofac Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Quantitatively assess bone density in maxillary sinus lifting with ABB (Bio-Oss®), using Cone-Beam computed tomography 6 months after surgery. Material and methods:A retrospective observational study was conducted between February 2018 and February 2019 on 33 Cone-Beam tomographic studies of 29 adult patients of both genders, with maxillary sinus fl oor lift, using Bio-Oss® small particles ( 0.25-1um), large particles (1-2um) or a 50-50 % mix of both, always using Bio-Gide® membranes, in order to measure bone density through Hounsfi eld Units (UH) after 6 months of healing. Results:The average density of the grafted sinuses was 586 ± 238 HU, corresponding to Type II-III bone. Gender (p = 0.079) and Residual bone (p = 0.681) showed no signifi cant differences, while Age (p = 0.015) and Particles Size (p = 0.002; p <0.05), were signifi cant. The highest tomographic density was obtained in patients older than 65 years; and in mixed particles size grafts. Conclusion:The bone density obtained after maxillary sinus lifting with Bio-Oss shows quantitative values similar to those of type II-III bone, providing a high degree of predictability for implant placement 6 months after the intervention.

show abstract

“…A 5-year prospective follow-up study conducted by Ozkan et al (2011) also found that sufficient quality and volume of bone, allowing for predictable simultaneous placement of implants, resulted from bovine bone grafts following one-stage maxillary sinus augmentation procedures [ 51 ]. Clinically, BioOss has proven to be a valuable bone substitute material providing good quality of new bone and promising long-term survival rates following dental surgery [ 52 ].…”

Section: Classification Of Dental Bone Graft and Substitute Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After tooth loss, bone resorption is irreversible, leaving the area without adequate bone volume for successful implant treatment. Bone grafting is the only solution to reverse dental bone loss and is a well-accepted procedure required in one in every four dental implants. Research and development in materials, design and fabrication technologies have expanded over the years to achieve successful and long-lasting dental implants for tooth substitution. This review will critically present the various dental bone graft and substitute materials that have been used to achieve a successful dental implant. The article also reviews the properties of dental bone grafts and various dental bone substitutes that have been studied or are currently available commercially. The various classifications of bone grafts and substitutes, including natural and synthetic materials, are critically presented, and available commercial products in each category are discussed. Different bone substitute materials, including metals, ceramics, polymers, or their combinations, and their chemical, physical, and biocompatibility properties are explored. Limitations of the available materials are presented, and areas which require further research and development are highlighted. Tissue engineering hybrid constructions with enhanced bone regeneration ability, such as cell-based or growth factor-based bone substitutes, are discussed as an emerging area of development.

show abstract

Bone Forming Potential of An-Organic Bovine Bone Graft: A Cone Beam CT study

Cited by 11 publications

References 21 publications

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bone Quality Obtained in Sinus Lifting with Anorganic Bovine Bone. A CBCT Study

Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About