2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical properties of human tympanic membrane in the quasi-static regime from in situ point indentation measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6(d-e) for a comprehensive description of the curvature of the TM. This is in agreement with earlier reports of 3D imaging of the TM which were carried out by several methods (23,24). Holographic measurements on post-mortem human or cat samples show that the TM has a cup like shape with the maximum depth of about 2-3 mm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…6(d-e) for a comprehensive description of the curvature of the TM. This is in agreement with earlier reports of 3D imaging of the TM which were carried out by several methods (23,24). Holographic measurements on post-mortem human or cat samples show that the TM has a cup like shape with the maximum depth of about 2-3 mm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…At first the sinusoidal profile was applied followed by the stepwise indentation. The application of sinusoidal and stepwise incremental displacement profiles was also used by Aernouts et al (2012) to quantify the mechanical properties of the tympanic membrane in the quasi-static regime. Figure 1: Orientation of the isolated malleus incus complexes (MICs) attached to the probe holder.…”
Section: Excitation Of the Malleus Incus Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, most authors adopt a uniform thickness value across the entire membrane, ranging from 30-150 μm for the human TM (Gaihede et al 2007;Decraemer and Funnell 2008;Daphalapurkar et al 2009;Aernouts et al 2012). While most modelers agree to employ an average value of around 74 μm (Gan et al 2004;Cheng et al 2007;Huang et al 2008;Luo et al 2009;Zhao et al 2009), some assume an average thickness value of 100 μm (Abel and Lord 2001; Wen et al 2006;Lee et al 2006;Le and Huynh 2008).…”
Section: Average Thickness Map Of the Human Eardrummentioning
confidence: 99%