2002
DOI: 10.1109/tepm.2002.804617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical fatigue test method for chip/underfill delamination in flip-chip packages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From observation, the results showed that the formation of cracks on the surface of the silicon die may be caused by exposure to gamma radiation. In the three-point bending test, the concentrated load could be given directly at the midpoint of the package [18]. When the load is applied, the package will deflect significantly (proportional to the load).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From observation, the results showed that the formation of cracks on the surface of the silicon die may be caused by exposure to gamma radiation. In the three-point bending test, the concentrated load could be given directly at the midpoint of the package [18]. When the load is applied, the package will deflect significantly (proportional to the load).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 are not captured by previous studies [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The complex trends vs. underfill modulus underlines the facts that the ERR dependence on underfill modulus is not straightforward: it also depends on other factors including underfill CTE, crack size, die size, die aspect ratio, fillet profile, etc, and the interactions among these factors.…”
Section: Effect Of Underfill Modulusmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The stress relief in solder joints due to the underfill, possible failure mechanisms, and the role and attributes of the visco-elastic behavior of the underfill material were assessed by Suryanarayana et al [106], Gilleo and Blumel [107], Semmens and Adams [108], Guo et al [109], Fan et al [110], Hirohata et al [111], Chai et al [112], and Erickson et al [113]. No modeling is possible, of course, if the mechanical/physical characteristics of the material are not available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%