2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical characterization of raw material quality and its implication for Early Upper Palaeolithic Moravia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lithic analysts recognize the need for replicable, ratio-scale measures of raw material suitability (however that is defined), and many see promise in the various mechanical tests developed by material scientists (for excellent reviews and recent applications, see Moník and Hadraba, 2016;Rodríguez-Rellán, 2016). Kyara's (1999) use of the "Aggregate Impact Value" test to assess rock strength is a notable example within the context of the Olduvai raw materials.…”
Section: Rebound Hardness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lithic analysts recognize the need for replicable, ratio-scale measures of raw material suitability (however that is defined), and many see promise in the various mechanical tests developed by material scientists (for excellent reviews and recent applications, see Moník and Hadraba, 2016;Rodríguez-Rellán, 2016). Kyara's (1999) use of the "Aggregate Impact Value" test to assess rock strength is a notable example within the context of the Olduvai raw materials.…”
Section: Rebound Hardness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X‐ray diffraction (XRD) as well as X‐ray fluorescence (XRF), although used in this research field (Domański et al, 2009; Domański & Webb, 1992), turned out to be poorly effective owing to their limited sensitivity to the actual structural changes induced by the heat treatments and to the lithotypes involved in the analysis (Cochrane et al, 2012). Mechanical tests proved to be potentially useful; however, because they can be partially destructive, can be applied with some difficulty to a large number of specimens from archaeological collections (Domański & Webb, 1992; Moník & Hadraba, 2016; Purdy & Brooks, 1971). Lately, roughness measurements were used to characterize successfully and detect the heat treatment on lithic artefacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MANA method is also problematic in some cases. For example, the interiors of many types of Moravian cherts, used for knapping in the Palaeolithic, vary considerably and that makes it difficult to identify the separate nodules (Neruda ; Moník and Hadraba ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%