Metal, Ceramic and Polymeric Composites for Various Uses 2011
DOI: 10.5772/23316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical Behavior of Filled Thermoplastic Polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All composites are ductile materials because ɛ b values in Figure 5(b) are mainly higher than limit fracture strain of 2–3%. 27 The simultaneous decrease of σ b and ɛ b values of composites with 8 vol% of polar silicas could be related to some additional factors discussed in tensile strength–spherulite size relationships.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All composites are ductile materials because ɛ b values in Figure 5(b) are mainly higher than limit fracture strain of 2–3%. 27 The simultaneous decrease of σ b and ɛ b values of composites with 8 vol% of polar silicas could be related to some additional factors discussed in tensile strength–spherulite size relationships.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, ɛ b values of composites with nonpolar S-D17 and A-R8200 silicas and common characteristic of large spherulites 15 obey polynomial fitting satisfactorily. Unexpected increase of the ɛ b values at 8 vol% of nonpolar silica could be attributed to still regular spherulites 27 due to decreased nucleation ability of enlarged aggregates in the iPP matrix according to Zou et al. 28 On the other side, modified S-D17 microparticles and A-R8200 aggregates/agglomerates with finer dispersion than other silica fillers could be more suitably accommodated in interspherulitic regions 15 and with improved interactions with compatible iPP matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If molecular ordering in the specimens subjected to loading during degradation was higher than that in other groups, the mechanical properties could have been increased as the result of the creep process. 29 At the intermediate degradation time point studied here, the application of tensile load to PLGA did not result in alterations to the chemical degradation of the material (i.e., changes in molecular weight). This is consistent with limited observations in the literature that mechanical loading does not affect the rate of molecular weight loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change in the molecular structure results in the decrease in crystallinity of PLA, which in turn decreases the load-bearing capacity or the tensile strength of the PLA/EVA blend. Moreover, EVA is an elastomeric, so it absorbs the impact energy and acts as stress concentrator [44]. It impedes the crack initiation and propagation due to which the toughness of PLA/EVA blend increases.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%