2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical and failure properties of rocks with a cavity under coupled static and dynamic loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rectangular cuboid granite specimens were tested by using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system with coupled static and dynamic loads, as shown in Figure 1. e modified SHPB system consists of a gas gun, a cone-shaped striker, an incident bar, a transmitted bar, a momentum bar, a damper, and a set of axial static pressure device [44].…”
Section: Loading Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rectangular cuboid granite specimens were tested by using a modified split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) system with coupled static and dynamic loads, as shown in Figure 1. e modified SHPB system consists of a gas gun, a cone-shaped striker, an incident bar, a transmitted bar, a momentum bar, a damper, and a set of axial static pressure device [44].…”
Section: Loading Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to deep mines disasters, scholars have carried out a lot of work from the aspects of mechanism research, surrounding rock support, and disaster prediction. The mechanism research includes in-situ stress measurement [2][3][4], surrounding rock quality classification [5][6][7], rock mechanics test [8][9][10][11], various failure criteria [12][13][14], et al The surrounding rock support includes the use of new-type bolts [15][16][17][18], filling of goaf [19][20][21][22], and combination of multiple support methods [23][24][25], and so on. Disaster prediction includes microseismic monitoring [26][27][28], various rockburst prediction models [29][30][31], et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e antibreaking measures (such as structural strengthening or surrounding rock strengthening) can effectively resist many adverse influences induced by the stick-slip fault. e reducing dislocation measures can reduce the transmission of shear force and forced displacement [9,10]. Some former research results have shown that the active joints in the secondary lining of tunnel structures can effectively reduce longitudinal dislocation, while the damping layers between the primary supports and the secondary linings can reduce lateral dislocation [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%