2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanical and barrier properties of nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced chitosan based nanocomposite films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

36
306
2
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 571 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
36
306
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only Atef et al but other research groups [61,62] too showed that due to good dispersion, low content of nanofiller (CNC) in polymer matrix (polylactide) is the best in terms of enhancement of mechanical properties. This hypothesis is also supported by this and our previous work [28,40], but stays in opposite to Khan et al [63] who claimed that 5% of CNC is optimal for chitosan. It comes as no surprise that aspect ratio of a filler, its interaction with polymer matrix, and uniform dispersion of filler are the main factors limiting mechanical properties of composites [63].…”
Section: Mechanical and Morphological Properties Of Compositessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not only Atef et al but other research groups [61,62] too showed that due to good dispersion, low content of nanofiller (CNC) in polymer matrix (polylactide) is the best in terms of enhancement of mechanical properties. This hypothesis is also supported by this and our previous work [28,40], but stays in opposite to Khan et al [63] who claimed that 5% of CNC is optimal for chitosan. It comes as no surprise that aspect ratio of a filler, its interaction with polymer matrix, and uniform dispersion of filler are the main factors limiting mechanical properties of composites [63].…”
Section: Mechanical and Morphological Properties Of Compositessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This hypothesis is also supported by this and our previous work [28,40], but stays in opposite to Khan et al [63] who claimed that 5% of CNC is optimal for chitosan. It comes as no surprise that aspect ratio of a filler, its interaction with polymer matrix, and uniform dispersion of filler are the main factors limiting mechanical properties of composites [63]. However, in this research, a polymorphic form of nanofiller seems to be the key variable.…”
Section: Mechanical and Morphological Properties Of Compositessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This finding indicated that good compatibility between the seaweed and the OPS nanofillers was achieved, in which the TS of the nanocomposite films were enhanced by the presence of OPS nanoparticles compared to the blank seaweed film. This phenomenon could be due to the high specific surface area and uniform dispersion of the nanoparticles in the matrix, and good bonding between the hydrophilic oil palm nanoparticles and seaweed with the presence of hydroxyl groups (-OH groups), which could provide better filler-matrix interfacial interactions and also allow for the effective transfer of stress through a shear mechanism from the matrix to the particles (Huq et al 2012;Khan et al 2012;Mohaiyiddin et al 2013;Zarina and Ahmad 2014;Rosamah et al 2016;Abdul Khalil et al 2016). Hence, it was believed that the nanocomposite film could sustain greater loads when up to 20% of OPS nanofillers were incorporated.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Bio-nanocomposite Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the tiny dimensions of nanocellulose imply a high exposure to its surroundings. The issue of biodegradation has been emphasized in studies in which nanocellulose was used in composite structures with other natural film-forming materials (Lu et al 2008;Ma et al 2008;Cheng et al 2009;Wan et al 2009; Azeredo et al 2010;Bras et al 2010;Khan et al 2010Khan et al , 2012Khan et al , 2014bSiro and Plackett 2010;da Silva et al 2012;Hassan et al 2012;Johnsy and Siddaramaiah 2012;Tang et al 2012; Baheti and Militky 2013; ChingaCarrasco et al 2013;Ollier et al 2013; Bhardwaj et al 2014;Dehnad et al 2014a;Fortunati et al 2014;Ghaderi et al 2014;Khalil et al 2014;Kumar et al 2014;Marais et al 2014;Reddy and Rhim 2014;Song et al 2014;Yang et al 2014; Azizi Samir et al 2015; Feng et al 2015a;Figueiredo et al 2015;Honorato et al 2015;Lavoine et al 2015;Li et al 2015a;Lu et al 2015; Youssef et al REVIEW ARTICLE bioresources.com . "Nanocellulose in packaging," BioResources 12(1), 2143-2233.…”
Section: Biodegradation Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%