2017
DOI: 10.4267/2042/64287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mecaster texanus (Echinoidea) from Turonian-Coniacian strata in the Sergipe-Alagoas Basin, Brazil

Abstract: M Me ec ca as st te er r t te ex xa an nu us s ( (E Ec ch hi in no oi id de ea a) )f fr ro om m T Tu ur ro on ni ia an n--C Co on ni ia ac ci ia an n s st tr ra at ta a i in n t th he e S Se er rg gi ip pe e--A Al la ag go oa as s B Ba as si in n, , B Br ra az zi il l

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Micraster and Diplodetus had been grouped into a monophyletic Micrasteridae due to the shared presence of an ethmophract apical disc and similarly patterned subanal fasciole (Smith and Stockley, 2005), although Diplodetus was found to be paraphyletic herein. Further, various authors (e.g., Smith and Bengtson, 1991; Stockley et al, 2005; Oliveira et al, 2013; Manso and Souza-Lima, 2017) have, either directly or on the basis of their taxonomic assignments, posited a relatively close relationship between Mecaster and Hemiaster . Some aspects of the phylogeny (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Micraster and Diplodetus had been grouped into a monophyletic Micrasteridae due to the shared presence of an ethmophract apical disc and similarly patterned subanal fasciole (Smith and Stockley, 2005), although Diplodetus was found to be paraphyletic herein. Further, various authors (e.g., Smith and Bengtson, 1991; Stockley et al, 2005; Oliveira et al, 2013; Manso and Souza-Lima, 2017) have, either directly or on the basis of their taxonomic assignments, posited a relatively close relationship between Mecaster and Hemiaster . Some aspects of the phylogeny (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5–10.1991 Mecaster texanum ; Smith in Smith and Bengtson, p. 13.2013 Mecaster texanum ; Oliveira et al, p. 11, figs. 7A–C, 9A–I.2017 Mecaster texanus ; Manso and Souza-Lima, p. 225, figs. 5, 6.…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%