2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring urban digitalization using cognitive mapping and the best worst method (BWM)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we comprehensively used various coupled and spatial–temporal effect models to measure and analyze the coupling between urban digitalization and green development in China and the four economic zones, which provides an empirical basis for green sustainable development in China’s urban digitalization construction process. Compared with the existing studies that separately measure urban digitization [ 97 , 98 ] and green development [ 99 , 100 ], or analyze the relationship between the two from the perspective of the unidirectional impact of the former on the latter [ 12 , 101 ], based on the perspective of coordination and interaction, in this study, we systematically measured the spatial–temporal differentiation, dynamic evolution and spatial effects of urban digitalization and green development, analyzed the current pattern and future trend of the CD&GDD, and comprehensively and systematically grasped the development law of the coupling coordination between digitalization and green development at the regional city level to solve the dilemma of the “energy rebound effect” of digitalization [ 9 , 102 ], and to provide a reasonable reference for the realization of urban green and high-quality development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we comprehensively used various coupled and spatial–temporal effect models to measure and analyze the coupling between urban digitalization and green development in China and the four economic zones, which provides an empirical basis for green sustainable development in China’s urban digitalization construction process. Compared with the existing studies that separately measure urban digitization [ 97 , 98 ] and green development [ 99 , 100 ], or analyze the relationship between the two from the perspective of the unidirectional impact of the former on the latter [ 12 , 101 ], based on the perspective of coordination and interaction, in this study, we systematically measured the spatial–temporal differentiation, dynamic evolution and spatial effects of urban digitalization and green development, analyzed the current pattern and future trend of the CD&GDD, and comprehensively and systematically grasped the development law of the coupling coordination between digitalization and green development at the regional city level to solve the dilemma of the “energy rebound effect” of digitalization [ 9 , 102 ], and to provide a reasonable reference for the realization of urban green and high-quality development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Objectives Tools Sources Selection of sustainable and resilient IoT supplier Spherical fuzzy BWM and TRUST Bonab et al [ 75 ] Evaluating man-made risks to urban areas and crucial resources Grey BWM-Grey MARCOS Bitarafan et al [ 76 ] Evaluating barriers to implementing circular economy in the electronics industry BWM-ISM-MICMAC Debnath et al [ 74 ] Exploring the Industry 5.0 challenges for post-pandemic supply chain sustainability BWM-ISM-MICMAC Karmaker et al [ 53 ] Analyzing Warehouse Accident Risks during Picking and Material Handling BWM-Grey Relational Analysis Hsu et al [ 77 ] Examining sustainable entrepreneurship determinants in SMEs. Cognitive mapping-BWM Mendes et al [ 78 ] Quantifying the Level of Digitalization in Municipalities Cognitive mapping-BWM Vieira et al [ 79 ] …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive mapping is a graphical representation that seeks to reflect decision makers' values, objectives, ideas, and experiences regarding complex decision problems (Ackermann & Eden, 2010). Various authors (e.g., Belton & Stewart, 2002;Eden, 2004;Vaz et al, 2022;Vieira et al, 2022) have advocated using cognitive mapping as a tool due to its great capability for structuring and clarifying complicated issues. According to Ferreira et -The calculation of blight levels was limited because the index is an average of the individual scores for each property, which may not correctly reflect reality.…”
Section: Problem-structuring Methods (Psms) and Cognitive Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%