2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the forest and income impacts of forest user group participation under Malawi's Forest Co-management Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Community involvement in and around MTPF through collaboration patterns in forest management is an effort to increase community income and prevent forest damage. Mazunda & Shively (2015) draw that collaborative programs in forest management can be useful to achieve environmental goals without victimizing household livelihoods. Households participating in forest Scientific Article ISSN: 2087-0469 The community income in research location covers income from food crops and horticulture, livestock, and NTFPs.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community involvement in and around MTPF through collaboration patterns in forest management is an effort to increase community income and prevent forest damage. Mazunda & Shively (2015) draw that collaborative programs in forest management can be useful to achieve environmental goals without victimizing household livelihoods. Households participating in forest Scientific Article ISSN: 2087-0469 The community income in research location covers income from food crops and horticulture, livestock, and NTFPs.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Respondentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in existing literature, the variables for the matching approach have an impact on program participation rather than on outcomes [22,33]. In this article, we chose the total household income as the outcome variable.…”
Section: Variable Chosen For Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CMAs have the potential to improve forest conditions by reducing illegal harvesting (Persha & Blomley 2009) or fostering greater awareness and investment in natural resource management (Andersson et al 2006). Longitudinal studies of devolution initiatives in sub-Saharan Africa show mixed results with both gains and losses in forest cover (Blomley et al 2008; Treue et al 2014; Mazunda & Shively 2015; Rasolofoson et al 2015). Studies examining the impacts of collaborative forest management on forest user incomes in Africa also have mixed results (Ameha et al 2014; Gelo & Koch 2014; Mazunda & Shively 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%