2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2580592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Systemic Risk in the Korean Banking Sector via Dynamic Conditional Correlation Models

Abstract: In this paper we study systemic risks in the Korean banking sector by using two famous systemic risk measuresthe MES (marginal expected shortfall) and CoVaR. To compute both measures we employ Engle's dynamic conditional correlation model. Our empirical analysis shows, first, that although these two systemic risk measures differ in defining the contributions to systemic risk, both are qualitatively very similar in explaining the cross-sectional differences in systemic risk contributions across banks. Second, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also find that the similarities and the differences of our measures of systemic risk are country‐varying. For instance, the rankings based on ΔCoVaR and MES have no significant correlation for Chinese banks while Yun and Moon () find that they are highly correlated for Korean banks. Overall, our findings have the important policy implication that financial regulators should acknowledge the different meaning of different systemic risk measures, and that they should not rely on one single measure to identify systemic risk of banks.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also find that the similarities and the differences of our measures of systemic risk are country‐varying. For instance, the rankings based on ΔCoVaR and MES have no significant correlation for Chinese banks while Yun and Moon () find that they are highly correlated for Korean banks. Overall, our findings have the important policy implication that financial regulators should acknowledge the different meaning of different systemic risk measures, and that they should not rely on one single measure to identify systemic risk of banks.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notes: ΔCoVaR (MES) in Yun and Moon () are the mean ΔCoVaR (MES) of 10 banks in Korea during 2008–2013. ΔCoVaR (MES) in this paper reported here are the mean ΔCoVaR (MES) of 16 banks in China during 2008–2013.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Temuan ini sejalan dengan teori bahwa Bank dengan permodalan yang kuat akan dapat bertahan. Penelitian sebelumnya jika menemukan bahwa banyak Bank dengan modal yang besar akan dapat memberikan kontribusi yang lebih besar terhadap kejadian sistemik jika banyak Bank tersebut mengalami kondisi default (Yun and Moon, 2014;Jonghe et. al., 2015;Pangestuti, 2018).…”
Section: Hasilunclassified
“…Using the CoVaR and Granger causality network, they investigated the effects of interconnectedness on the systemic risk in the Asian financial market. In another paper, Yun and Moon used the dynamic conditional correlation model to estimate both measures of CoVaR and SRISK in the South Korean banking system (Yun & Moon, 2014). In another study, the ΔCoVaR used as a measure to compare the roles of foreign and domestic banks in the systemic crises of the United States and the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%