2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring social capital through network analysis and its influence on individual performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A research collaboration can take various forms depending on the institution, field, sector and country, and is typically measured through multi-author or multi-address papers (Katz and Martin, 1997). Its importance stems from the benefits that it provides to academics, as it is associated with high academic performance and productivity (Abbasi et al, 2014;Ductor, 2014;Rostan and Ceravolo, 2015;Zutshi et al, 2012). A collaboration is usually initiated by the material, knowledge-based or social needs of academics, such as the need for infrastructure, research equipment and personnel (Melin, 2000;Rostan and Ceravolo, 2015).…”
Section: Engagement and Collaboration Within Academia And The Role Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A research collaboration can take various forms depending on the institution, field, sector and country, and is typically measured through multi-author or multi-address papers (Katz and Martin, 1997). Its importance stems from the benefits that it provides to academics, as it is associated with high academic performance and productivity (Abbasi et al, 2014;Ductor, 2014;Rostan and Ceravolo, 2015;Zutshi et al, 2012). A collaboration is usually initiated by the material, knowledge-based or social needs of academics, such as the need for infrastructure, research equipment and personnel (Melin, 2000;Rostan and Ceravolo, 2015).…”
Section: Engagement and Collaboration Within Academia And The Role Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yan and Ding [21] analyzed the Library and Information Science co-authorship network in relation to the impact of their researchers, finding important correlations. Abbasi et al extensively studied the relationship between scientific impact and co-authorship pattern, discovering significant correlations between network indicators (density and egobetweenness) and performance indicators such as g-index [1] and citation counts [2]. McCarty et al [17] attempted to predict the h-index evolution through ego networks, observing that this factor increases if one can choose to coauthor articles with authors already having a high h-index.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbasi et al [29] in their attempt to measure social capital proposed a set of metrices as assets in networks. More specifically they proposed:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%