Handbook of Resilience in Children 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3661-4_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Resilience in Children: From Theory to Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dent & Cameron, 2003;Grotberg, 2003;Winslow, Sandler & Wolnick, 2005), the major life events or episodic, traumatic events measured by the Life Events Checklist (Work et al, 1990), and the stressors measured by the Sources of Stress Inventory (Chandler, 1981). As suggested by Naglieri & LeBuffe (2005), daily hassles, for example, poor quality child care and teasing were included to gain a complete picture of exposure to risk and adversity. Significant themes relating to the adversities or external realities that emerged from the responses of the children and/or key informants linked to three contexts, namely their family, their community or neighbourhood, and their school.…”
Section: External Realities: Stressors and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dent & Cameron, 2003;Grotberg, 2003;Winslow, Sandler & Wolnick, 2005), the major life events or episodic, traumatic events measured by the Life Events Checklist (Work et al, 1990), and the stressors measured by the Sources of Stress Inventory (Chandler, 1981). As suggested by Naglieri & LeBuffe (2005), daily hassles, for example, poor quality child care and teasing were included to gain a complete picture of exposure to risk and adversity. Significant themes relating to the adversities or external realities that emerged from the responses of the children and/or key informants linked to three contexts, namely their family, their community or neighbourhood, and their school.…”
Section: External Realities: Stressors and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are taking in consideration the opportunity to identify students' needs on a representative group of 6-9 year old Romanian primary school students, using specific research instruments applied in positive psychology. Using scaled and questionnaire based instruments like Child Development Supplement (2002), the short form, Devereux's scale to evaluate the strengths of students' social and emotional behavior (Naglieri, LeBuffe, & Ross, 2013) and also the Penn interaction scale (Fantuzzo, Coolahan, Mendez, McDermott & Sutton-Smith, 1998, Naglieri, LeBuffe, & Ross, 2013. The results should offer an overall view on the emotional and social needs and provide a base for an action plan for teachers to develop in their classes.…”
Section: The Author's Contribution On the Existing Theory And Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first problem with this approach is that the majority of measures focus on resilient qualities at the level of the individual only (Ahern, Kiehl, Sole, & Byers, 2006;Naglieri & LeBuffe, 2005;Windle et al, 2011). For example, items on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC; Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007;Connor & Davidson, 2003) solely tap into personal factors of resilience including control, commitment, challenge, adaptability, and problem-solving.…”
Section: Measuring Protective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, without the simultaneous measurement of contextspecific stressors, this connection cannot be corroborated. Examining the interplay between resilient characteristics and adverse events is an important aspect of resilience research since it highlights the processes underlying vulnerability or adaptation (Luthar & Zelazo, 2003;Naglieri & LeBuffe, 2005;Rutter, 2006;Windle, 2011). Indeed, Rutter (2006) argued that "resilience is an interactive concept that can only be studied if there is a thorough measurement of risk and protective factors" (p. 3).…”
Section: Measuring Protective Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation