2001
DOI: 10.1126/science.1063789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Past Biodiversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, although Alroy and others (11) recently suggested that the Cenozoic diversity increase may not be as large as currently thought, the techniques used in their analyses turn out to not account for all sources of diversity (24). Other views include those of Jackson and Johnson (12), who have recently argued that diversity may have increased more than recorded in the Sepkoski database. Regardless of the outcome of debate about overall Cenozoic diversity history, the pattern of proportional diversity should not be subject to stratigraphic sampling bias.…”
Section: A Note On Sampling Biasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, although Alroy and others (11) recently suggested that the Cenozoic diversity increase may not be as large as currently thought, the techniques used in their analyses turn out to not account for all sources of diversity (24). Other views include those of Jackson and Johnson (12), who have recently argued that diversity may have increased more than recorded in the Sepkoski database. Regardless of the outcome of debate about overall Cenozoic diversity history, the pattern of proportional diversity should not be subject to stratigraphic sampling bias.…”
Section: A Note On Sampling Biasmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conspicuously absent from our discussion, however, is any analysis of the longstanding debate about the ups and downs of the diversity of life throughout the Phanerozoic (since 530 Mya). This is because the data so far used are so poor [7,8] that we still do not know whether diversity was similar between the Paleozoic (543-250 Mya) and Cenozoic (since 65.5 Mya) [9] or increased several fold [10]. We believe that this question can be answered but will require intensive fieldwork and systematic sampling rather than reliance upon previously published studies [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is because most species are rare and are therefore commonly missed in all but the most detailed and extensive surveys [70,78,79]. One of the best ways to deal with this problem in both fossil and living material is to plot collector's curves of numbers of taxa encountered with increasing effort as measured by numbers of samples or specimens coupled with some index of diversity [7,39,40,54,79]. whether the absence of a species reflects either real limits to distribution or sampling bias.…”
Section: Box 1 Compositional Fidelity Of Fossil Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…from species to genus, from genus to family, from family to order, etc). However, since the Palaeozoic, there has been a tumultuous appearance of the majority of the greater taxa, whereas in more recent times there has been a huge increment in the appearance of the number of minor taxa such as species and genera (Signor, 1978(Signor, , 1982(Signor, , 1985Raup, 1983;Benton, 1993Benton, , 2001Smith, 2001;Sepkoski, 2002;Lane & Benton, 2003;Bush & Bambach, 2004;Jackson & Johnson, 2001;Holland & Sclafani, 2015;but see, e.g., Mc Gowan & Smith, 2008;Ruban, 2010). Nearly all these minor taxa can, however, be inserted into already-known greater taxa (orders, classes, and phyla).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%