2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.092803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring longitudinal beam parameters in the low energy section of the Oak Ridge Spallation Neutron Source accelerator

Abstract: Knowledge of the longitudinal beam parameters is important for understanding beam dynamics in hadron linacs. Recently, a noninterceptive method suitable for measuring the longitudinal rms Twiss parameters in the high energy part of a hadron linac was developed and experimentally verified at the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS). This work presents an extension and modification of the method to allow measurements in the low energy part of a linac. Like the original method, amplitude of the beam rf harmonic measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "most realistic" PARMTEQ simulation, based on measured LEBT distribution, predicted rms emittances 20-30% larger than measured. This is consistent with errors typically seen in RFQ benchmarking (eg, [22,23]), and is an improvement on the 80% discrepancy found with independent measurements in the SNS MEBT [24], but is still unsatisfactory. Despite the discrepancy, the simulation qualitatively reproduced the observed high-dimensional structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The "most realistic" PARMTEQ simulation, based on measured LEBT distribution, predicted rms emittances 20-30% larger than measured. This is consistent with errors typically seen in RFQ benchmarking (eg, [22,23]), and is an improvement on the 80% discrepancy found with independent measurements in the SNS MEBT [24], but is still unsatisfactory. Despite the discrepancy, the simulation qualitatively reproduced the observed high-dimensional structure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%