2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtm.2003.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring lean ports performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
102
0
11

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
102
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of the integration imperative, there is a clear argument for viewing the port terminal as an integral, rather than peripheral or incidental, part of the supply chain and, further, that the port's integration with other organizations is critical to its competitive viability (Heaver 1995;Marlow and Paixão Casaca 2003;Bichou and Gray 2004;Jacobs and Hall 2007;Song and Panayides 2008). The combination of containerization, intermodalism, and discretionary cargo gives shippers and carriers greater latitude in selecting ports of call which intensifies the competition between ports.…”
Section: Intermodal Logistics and Interorganizational Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the integration imperative, there is a clear argument for viewing the port terminal as an integral, rather than peripheral or incidental, part of the supply chain and, further, that the port's integration with other organizations is critical to its competitive viability (Heaver 1995;Marlow and Paixão Casaca 2003;Bichou and Gray 2004;Jacobs and Hall 2007;Song and Panayides 2008). The combination of containerization, intermodalism, and discretionary cargo gives shippers and carriers greater latitude in selecting ports of call which intensifies the competition between ports.…”
Section: Intermodal Logistics and Interorganizational Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Bichou and Gray (2005) propose that the performance of ports could be measured according to its contribution to overall added value of the channel. While some studies (i.e: Marlow and Paixao, 2003;Paixao and Marlow, 2003) offer logistics concepts such as leanness and agility for investigating port performance, other follow an empirical approach and suggest several constructs such as value-added services (i.e: Tongzon et al 2009) and information and communication systems (i.e: Panayides and Song, 2009). For instance, Carbone and De Martino (2003) investigate the contribution of a port to value creation through a case analysis, whereas Song and Panayides (2008) use 'use of information and communication technology', 'relationship with shipping line', 'value added service', 'integration of transport modes', and 'relationship with inland transport operators' as measures of port supply chain integration through a questionnaire survey.…”
Section: The Changing Role Of Ports and Integration Of Ports To Supplmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the fact that it is tested on a number of ports, it is still an illustrative and none conclusive method. Reference [30] proposed a two-stage, internal and external, integration approach to measuring port performance with emphasis on the qualitative aspects in order to increase visibility within the port settings and along the transport chain, thus a better supply chain and logistics actors' integration. This lean methodology extends to the port networking environment and requires increasing flexibility which will subsequently increase the port's sustainability [31].…”
Section: Measuring Performancementioning
confidence: 99%