Measuring Inequality in Rural England: The Effects of Changing Spatial Resolution

Abstract

The sustainability of rural development depends on the distribution of the social and environmental resources needed to maintain and improve the vitality of rural areas. Here we examine the complexity of measuring patterns of distribution using examples of socioeconomic data on rural poverty and affluence as well as data on environmental quality and species richness. We demonstrate how changes in the base spatial units used for analysis have different effects on different measures of inequality. The effects of such changes in spatial resolution also depend on the underlying processes that generate the data. The results of our investigations into the effects of scale on the assessment of inequality suggest that, where data come from both the social and natural science sources, the most appropriate level for analysis is that of the finest common resolution. This may result in redundancy of effort for some types of data but any such disadvantage is offset by the benefits of identifying inequalities that are masked at coarser resolutions.

Land Reform beyond the Reformed Land: A Baseline Study of Unplanned Site Allocations in Brazil

“…Consideration must thus be given to the role of regional planning in the policy-making process, bearing in mind the benefits (and possibly costs) of the policy not only to individual settlements, but also to the whole economy of the region (Lowe, 2009;Uyarra & Flanagan, 2010). A need has thus been recognized of a suited space for bringing an element of plan-led coordination into land reform in order to map out the actual situation and specify goals and means required for achieving steady rural development (Bristow et al, 2009;Huby et al, 2009).…”

Assessment of temporal trends in ecosystem health using an holistic indicator

“…For example, Huby et al (2006) highlighted the potential interactions between socio-economic and environmental data, based on spatial integration of interdisciplinary data on bird counts, land use and land cover to a common 1 km  1 km unit grid. Huby et al (2009) modified and extended the original dataset to explicitly demonstrate the impacts of changing spatial resolution on measures of social and environmental inequality. These studies revealed the complex challenges which arise when incorporating data across many disciplines, challenges which must be met if effective management and policy are to be achieved .…”

Fuel poverty in the UK: Is there a difference between rural and urban areas?

“…This is perhaps surprising given the extensive research considering social deprivation and its experience across space (e.g. Campanera and Higgins, 2011;Cloke et al 1997;Huby et al, 2009;Phimister et al, 2000). 1 In the context of fuel poverty, an argument often raised in the policy debate is that rural households are disadvantaged due to the nature of rural housing stock and the more limited choice of energy available in rural areas.…”