2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring fuel poverty in France: Which households are the most fuel vulnerable?

Abstract: International audienceno abstrac

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
106
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
106
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptualizing processes of targeting, identification of households and implementation as three interdependent steps has highlighted the complex errors of inclusion and exclusion implicated in the design of France's rapidly developing fuel poverty policy (Dubois, 2012). The increasing amount of public attention and state funding attracted by the energy poverty predicament in this country has been accompanied by the expansion of scientific research devoted to the issue, especially in terms of the relationship between vulnerability patterns and support policies (Bafoil, Fodor, & le Roux, 2014;Bartl, 2010;Legendre & Ricci, 2015;Ortar, 2016). Several recent contributions indicate that energy poverty is even present in countries like Germany, where rates of social inequality and inefficient housing are at record low levels (Becker, Kouschil, & Naumann, 2014;Billen, 2008;Großmann, Schaffrin, & Smigiel, 2016;Kopatz, 2009;März, 2017;Tews, 2014).…”
Section: In-depth Research At the National And Local Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conceptualizing processes of targeting, identification of households and implementation as three interdependent steps has highlighted the complex errors of inclusion and exclusion implicated in the design of France's rapidly developing fuel poverty policy (Dubois, 2012). The increasing amount of public attention and state funding attracted by the energy poverty predicament in this country has been accompanied by the expansion of scientific research devoted to the issue, especially in terms of the relationship between vulnerability patterns and support policies (Bafoil, Fodor, & le Roux, 2014;Bartl, 2010;Legendre & Ricci, 2015;Ortar, 2016). Several recent contributions indicate that energy poverty is even present in countries like Germany, where rates of social inequality and inefficient housing are at record low levels (Becker, Kouschil, & Naumann, 2014;Billen, 2008;Großmann, Schaffrin, & Smigiel, 2016;Kopatz, 2009;März, 2017;Tews, 2014).…”
Section: In-depth Research At the National And Local Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I subsequently provide a fieldbased exploration of fuel poverty via the lens of energy precarity, by using vignettes from a survey and interviews The term "energy precarity" has been used in its French translation ("pr ecarit e energ etique") to define and target vulnerable households in France. According to French legislation, a household suffers from "pr ecarit e energ etique" if it encounters difficulties in obtaining the energy required to meet its basic energy needs due to insufficient financial resources or housing conditions (Legendre & Ricci, 2015). Despite its inclusivity, this definition has not been developed with reference to wider conceptual understandings of precarity, and has also been criticised for its vagueness (Dubois & Meier, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the households forced to reduce drastically their energy consumption because they cannot afford the associated costs are probably not recorded as fuel poor when implementing this approach [27,10,14,43]. T o overcome this problem, the calculation framework is modified by requiring "satisfactory" heating.…”
Section: Objective Measures Of Fuel Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boardman's choice of 10% threshold was justified as twice the median of households' expenditure for energy services according to the 1988 Family Expenditure Survey for UK's households [29]. Since then, the threshold of 10% has been used widely as a general criterion for calculating the number of fuel poor households in a region or country (see for example [42,45,36,27].…”
Section: Objective Measures Of Fuel Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%