2003
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000079107.04349.9a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Energy Expenditure in Habitually Active and Sedentary Pregnant Women

Abstract: All methods were sensitive to variation in both the rate of EE and the duration over which activity was monitored. Accelerometry and PAR are useful methods for categorizing EE in epidemiologic studies among pregnant women but absolute estimates are biased relative to HR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
46
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
46
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sports participation or structured exercise was extremely low throughout the study, hence, this effect is likely to be minimal and would not explain a decline in activity. In contrast to the present study, Stein et al (2003) detected no significant change in physical activity using recall, accelerometry and heart rate telemetry. The latter study, however, selected subjects on the basis of habitual activity levels, perhaps mitigating against the likelihood of observing changes during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sports participation or structured exercise was extremely low throughout the study, hence, this effect is likely to be minimal and would not explain a decline in activity. In contrast to the present study, Stein et al (2003) detected no significant change in physical activity using recall, accelerometry and heart rate telemetry. The latter study, however, selected subjects on the basis of habitual activity levels, perhaps mitigating against the likelihood of observing changes during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Activity diaries in the general population have been shown to overestimate physical activity (Conway et al, 2002). In pregnant women, activity diaries were shown to overestimate physical activity by around 400 kcal/day, whereas accelerometry underestimated activity by a similar amount compared with heart rate telemetry (Stein et al, 2003). However, both self-report activity and accerelometry are valuable methods for examining within-subject changes in physical activity, and for assigning rank order within a population, since the degree of over-or under estimation will be relatively consistent within individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Butte et al 1 , the traditional approach to the determination of nutritional requirements only considers the increase in the basal metabolic rate (BMR) of pregnant women, but may underestimate the true energy requirements since it does not consider energy expenditure during physical activity and the thermic effect of feeding. Thus, efforts have been made to determine not only the increase in the BMR during pregnancy, but also that resulting from physical exercise in order to potentiate its health benefits for the woman and child [1][2][3][4][5] . Since the leisure physical activity most commonly performed by women during pregnancy is walking 6 , studies have investigated the energy expenditure of women during this type of exercise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%