2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Significant changes in physical activity among pregnant women in the UK as assessed by accelerometry and self-reported activity

Abstract: Objective: Research on the impact of maternal physical activity on pregnancy outcomes has often employed subjective measures of physical activity obtained by diary or questionnaire. This study investigates the feasibility of using accelerometry as an objective measure of physical activity of pregnant women compared with subjective data obtained via activity recall among pregnant women. Design: Activity data were collected prospectively on 57 women at 12, 16, 25, 34 and 38 weeks of gestation. Total daily physic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
120
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(51 reference statements)
11
120
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The previous research in the literature noted that the level of physical activity gradually declined as pregnancy advanced into the second and third trimesters (9,10). Based on these literature findings, we may suggest that the losses in balance and handgrip strength are associated with the decreased physical activity level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The previous research in the literature noted that the level of physical activity gradually declined as pregnancy advanced into the second and third trimesters (9,10). Based on these literature findings, we may suggest that the losses in balance and handgrip strength are associated with the decreased physical activity level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The energy cost of DIT seems to be unaltered (Nagy and King, 1984;Poppitt et al, 1993;Spaaij et al, 1994;Bronstein et al, 1995;Piers et al, 1995;Prentice et al, 1996) or even reduced (Contaldo et al, 1987;Illingworth et al, 1987;KoppHoolihan et al, 1999). The energy cost attributed to PA is generally low (Lawrence and Whitehead, 1988;Butte et al, 2004;Clarke et al, 2005;Lof and Forsum, 2006;Rousham et al, 2006) and tends to decrease as pregnancy advances (Lawrence et al, 1985;van Raaij et al, 1987;Singh et al, 1989;Heini et al, 1991;Forsum et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pregnancy PA patterns have so far been investigated through questionnaires (Lof and Forsum, 2006) or interviews (Clarke et al, 2005;Rousham et al, 2006;Borodulin et al, 2008). However, the reliability and validity of all selfreported methods is limited because of misreporting or miscoding of activities, inaccurate estimation of activity intensity or duration and differences in body mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] One potentially changeable risk factor is physical activity, women who engaged in moderate to vigorous leisure time physical activities (LTPAs) before and during pregnancy experienced up to a 35% reduction in preeclampsia. [10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%