2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2003.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring efficiency and predicting optimal set durations of pots for blue cod Parapercis colias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Catches of Tomtate, Stenotomus spp., and Sand Perch declined with increasing soak times, indicating that at least some individuals of these 3 species may have escaped from the trap. These results are consistent with our own observations and a growing body of literature that indicates that some fi sh, crab, and lobster species frequently escape from traps and pots (Jury et al, 2001;Cole et al, 2004;Sturdivant and Clark, 2011). Tomtate, Stenotomus spp., and Sand Perch were among the 3 smallest fi sh species examined in our study, and their small size may have allowed them to escape through the narrow trap entrance more easily than could species of larger size.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Catches of Tomtate, Stenotomus spp., and Sand Perch declined with increasing soak times, indicating that at least some individuals of these 3 species may have escaped from the trap. These results are consistent with our own observations and a growing body of literature that indicates that some fi sh, crab, and lobster species frequently escape from traps and pots (Jury et al, 2001;Cole et al, 2004;Sturdivant and Clark, 2011). Tomtate, Stenotomus spp., and Sand Perch were among the 3 smallest fi sh species examined in our study, and their small size may have allowed them to escape through the narrow trap entrance more easily than could species of larger size.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(Goldman 3 ), but the 2 explanations are not mutually exclusive. Experimental work should be conducted with underwater video to quantify entry and exit rates of reef fi shes in fi sh traps-research that can provide signifi cant insights into the catch dynamics and species interactions of marine organisms (e.g., Jury et al, 2001;Cole et al, 2004;Sturdivant and Clark, 2011).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While an acoustic shadow was produced by fish and some of the fish pot and frame structures fish could be observed inside the pot and at both tunnels until the numbers of fish surrounding the gear obscured the camera view. Multiple cameras have occasionally been used to observe multiple tunnels in fish pots (e.g., Cole et al, 2004), but this increases equipment expense and video processing time, and the field of view around the fishing gear is not captured. (5) The overhead projection for the field of view along with digital format allows for easy digitization of fish pathways and fish can be measured.…”
Section: Utility Of the Acoustic Cameramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The catch of fish traps left at sea or lost has generally been considered insignificant due to high rates of ingress and egress (escapement) of fish from traps (e.g., Luckhurst and Ward, 1987;Whitelaw et al, 1991;Cole et al, 2004;Newman et al, 2009;Harvey et al, unpublished data). Observed catches of fish from traps left at sea between fishing trips in the NDSF have been substantial; e.g., the catch from traps dumped for six days prior to a fishing trip comprised 7% of the landed catch from the normal commercial fishing operations of that nine-day fishing trip (estimated from the statutory logsheets from the fishery).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%