2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2014.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Distance between Unordered Sets of Different Sizes

Abstract: We present a distance metric based upon the notion of minimum-cost injective mappings between sets. Our function satisfies metric properties as long as the cost of the minimum mappings is derived from a semimetric, for which the triangle inequality is not necessarily satisfied. We show that the Jaccard distance (alternatively biotope, Tanimoto, or Marczewski-Steinhaus distance) may be considered the special case for finite sets where costs are derived from the discrete metric. Extensions that allow premetrics … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 13,910 feature vectors were divided into 10 batches, and each batch is configured to distribute the six target gases uniformly in time order [22]. The MCHP dataset is comprised of five static gestures (hand poses) captured from 12 users using a Vicon motion-capture camera system and a glove with attached infrared markers on certain joints [23]. The five gestures captured were a fist, pointing with one finger, pointing with two fingers, stop (hand flat), and grab (fingers curled).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 13,910 feature vectors were divided into 10 batches, and each batch is configured to distribute the six target gases uniformly in time order [22]. The MCHP dataset is comprised of five static gestures (hand poses) captured from 12 users using a Vicon motion-capture camera system and a glove with attached infrared markers on certain joints [23]. The five gestures captured were a fist, pointing with one finger, pointing with two fingers, stop (hand flat), and grab (fingers curled).…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…max {x i , y i } (with the subcase that x i = µ A (z) and y i = µ B (z) denote multiplicities of (occurrences of) z in multisets A and B; cf. [9]), and the Steinhaus distance [12,4] (i.e., any set measures, including probability measures). We mention that all these results can equally easily be proven by the arguments in [5]; however, for modular functions satisfying f (∅) > 0, these arguments fail.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MoCap Hand Postures dataset (Gardner et al 2014) consists of 5 types of hand postures/gestures from 12 users recorded in a motion capture environment using 11 unlabeled markers attached to a glove. We only use a small subset of the data with 200 samples for each cluster.…”
Section: Mocap Hand Postures Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 5 we show that the attack is successful for different datasets where the true metric is not known. • We test our algorithm (Section 5) on Ward's Hierarchical clustering (Ward Jr 1963), and the K-Means clustering (Lloyd 1982) on multiple datasets, e.g., the UCI Handwritten Digits dataset (Alpaydin and Kaynak 1995), the MNIST dataset (LeCun 1998), the MoCap Hand Postures dataset (Gardner et al 2014), and the UCI Wheat Seeds dataset (Charytanowicz et al 2010). We find that our attack algorithm generates multiple spill-over adversarial samples across all datasets and algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%