2009
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Concentrations of Ammonia in Ambient Air or Exhaust Air Stream using Acid Traps

Abstract: Strong acid solutions have been widely used in acid traps to determine concentrations of ammonia in ambient air or exhaust air stream. A literature survey indicates the method has a long history and a wide variation in use. Through a series of studies, this paper examines several factors including volume of the acid, depth of the acid, and airflow rate; that might affect the efficiency of sulfuric acid traps and recommends steps researchers and other users may take to ensure reliable results from this method. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the outdoor study however, the wind probably caused NH 3 dispersion to the atmosphere, possibly diminishing the quantity of NH 3 reaching the acid traps. For example, Ndegwa and Vaddella (2009) evaluated the efficiency of acid traps in capturing NH 3 at two different airflow rates (0.5 and 1.0 L min −1 ) and found that the efficiency was significantly greater at the lower airflow rate. Also, for the indoor study, immobilization of N was not favored since the packed soils trays had no vegetation, while the presence of vegetation in the outdoor study might have influenced biological processes, causing N immobilization, thus reducing the magnitude of NH 3 losses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the outdoor study however, the wind probably caused NH 3 dispersion to the atmosphere, possibly diminishing the quantity of NH 3 reaching the acid traps. For example, Ndegwa and Vaddella (2009) evaluated the efficiency of acid traps in capturing NH 3 at two different airflow rates (0.5 and 1.0 L min −1 ) and found that the efficiency was significantly greater at the lower airflow rate. Also, for the indoor study, immobilization of N was not favored since the packed soils trays had no vegetation, while the presence of vegetation in the outdoor study might have influenced biological processes, causing N immobilization, thus reducing the magnitude of NH 3 losses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 3 -N captured in the acid trap was generally low. Recovery was even lower in the initial stages of the incubation (on average, 19.2 ± 0.72% during the first 3 days of incubation) suggesting that: (1) the acid trap did not effectively capture NH 3 -N emitted from manure, particularly when emissions were most intensive, or (2) N was being lost from manure in forms other than NH 3 -N. We have investigated the factors affecting the NH 3 -N trapping efficiency of acid solutions and reported that efficiency decreases with increasing the amount of NH 3 -N being emitted [13]. Decreased trapping efficiency, however, could not explain the large discrepancy between manure N losses and NH 3 -N captured in the acid trap in Exp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of the individual animal approaches, ammonia emissions could be measured directly in animal houses with different compartments containing animals receiving different diets. Measurements can either be done in the barn air or in exhaust air chimneys (Ndegwa et al, 2009). The latter is difficult to achieve in ruminants as forced exhaust air systems are not common.…”
Section: Methods To Measure N Emissions From Manurementioning
confidence: 99%