2006
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1006-767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring cognitive deficits in disabled mice using an automated interactive touchscreen system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To study the effect of exercise on dentate gyrus-mediated pattern separation, adult and aged mice were tested on a spatial discrimination task (29) carried out in an automated touch-screen testing system (27,30). Running selectively enhanced spatial touch-screen performance when stimuli were presented in close proximity in adult mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To study the effect of exercise on dentate gyrus-mediated pattern separation, adult and aged mice were tested on a spatial discrimination task (29) carried out in an automated touch-screen testing system (27,30). Running selectively enhanced spatial touch-screen performance when stimuli were presented in close proximity in adult mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, previous studies may have been confounded by possible changes in motor skills. In the present study, a touch-screen method was used, which has minimal motor requirements (27,30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A) developed the touchscreen testing method for rats, a method which has more recently been adapted for mice (Izquierdo et al 1993;Bussey et al 2001b;Brigman et al 2005;Morton et al 2006). This computer-automated behavioral testing method allows computer graphic stimuli to be presented to a rodent and the rodent to respond to the computer screen via a nose-poke directly to the stimulus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the advantages of facilitated translation between human and animal tests, the task offers many other advantages, including low motoric demand, ease of administration, and accuracy of task parameters. The method has been used effectively in a number of behavioral, lesion, and pharmacological studies (e.g., Izquierdo et al 1993;Sahgal and Steckler 1994;Steckler and Sahgal 1995;Markham et al 1996;Bussey et al 1997aBussey et al ,b, 1998Bussey et al , 2001aParkinson et al 1999Parkinson et al , 2002Chudasama et al 2001;Chudasama and Robbins 2003;Cook et al 2004;Dalley et al 2005;Janisewicz and Baxter 2003;Brigman et al 2005;Minini and Jeffery 2006;Morton et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%