2001
DOI: 10.1080/713775733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring and managing brand loyalty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
91
1
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
91
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, loyalty towards the store has been defi ned as the biased behavioural response expressed over time by a decision-making unit regarding an establishment in comparison with other stores, as a consequence of psychological decision making and evaluative processes that result in the commitment to the store ( Knox and Walker, 2001 ). There is empirical evidence of the positive relationship between attitude and loyalty in retailing ( Macintosh and Lockshin, 1997 ).…”
Section: Perceived Value and Customer Attitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, loyalty towards the store has been defi ned as the biased behavioural response expressed over time by a decision-making unit regarding an establishment in comparison with other stores, as a consequence of psychological decision making and evaluative processes that result in the commitment to the store ( Knox and Walker, 2001 ). There is empirical evidence of the positive relationship between attitude and loyalty in retailing ( Macintosh and Lockshin, 1997 ).…”
Section: Perceived Value and Customer Attitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schwartz (2004) point out that too many choices lead to less satisfaction with the decision. Knox and Walker (2001) point out that high sensation of variety seekers are pruchasers with low brand commitment. In the study of Helm and Landschulze (2009), variety seekers interested familiar brands instead of new brand alternatives.…”
Section: Variety Seeking Tendency (Vst)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latest studies have focus on the relationship between customer loyalty and quality, satisfaction (Martensen et al, 2000;McDougall & Levesque, 2000) probability (Hallowell, 1996) or lack of profitability (Reinartz & Kumar, 2000) and frequency programmed effectiveness (Shoemaker & Lewis, 1999). Thus, despite all the attention in the general concept and the universal confidence in the benefits of loyalty, development in measuring and clearly defining it have been very limited (Knox & Walker, 2001). …”
Section: Customer Loyalty and Its Conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is identification of a need for greater knowledge and understanding in relation to customer loyalty (Knox & Walker, 2001). This results from ambiguity that subsists over the meaning and measurement of the construct and the absence of academic literature in this area (Hart et al, 1999).…”
Section: Customer Loyalty and Its Conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%