Measuring and Integrating Risk Management into Green Innovation Practices for Green Manufacturing under the Global Value Chain

Sun, Yingying; Bi, Kexin; Yin, Shi

doi:10.3390/su12020545

Cited by 71 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 76 publications

(192 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Three methods were applied to identify the green innovation risks of manufacturing under the global value chain. From the perspective of the green innovation process, four risks were classified: green R&D risk, green manufacturing risk, green marketing risk, and green service risk [25]. Given these risks, one should take into account the behavior of indicators and how they change at the time of development fluctuations [26].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Green Technology and Sustainable Development: Assessment and Green Growth Frameworks

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics of a sustainable development assessment methodology being designed in the context of green technology. The methodology in question is based on indicators from the Sustainable Development Goals Index (SGDI), specifically in its ecological component. These indicators underlie an Averaging Sustainable Development Index (АSDI) and a Normalized Sustainable Development Index (NSDI). The resultant methodology was applied to 20 countries from the SDGI ranking. According to the research results, the intensive activity of the brown industries in the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan, the United States, Korea, and Russia resulted in significant carbon dioxide emissions. Switzerland, Kazakhstan, and Russia had high scores on sustainable management of water and sanitation. Russia was the only developed country to have an АSDI higher than its SDGI and its gap between NSDI and АSDI indexes was not significant, indicating a positive trend in greentech development. The reason why NSDI was increasingly different from SDGI was that countries leading the socio-economic rankings had higher consumption of energy and resources, and a much greater environmental footprint than those countries that consumed less. The originality of this study is that it identifies gaps between NSDI and ASDI values, which indicate that conditions for greentech adoption in most developing countries are unfavorable.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Green Technology and Sustainable Development: Assessment and Green Growth Frameworks

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Finally, the current problem of finding the balance between economic growth and sustainable development makes it necessary to progress on associated risk. Future research should consider risk associated with new concepts, such as the development of green technology, the application process of which is associated with great uncertainty and risk (Sun et al 2020 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times

Settembre-Blundo

González-Sánchez

Medina-Salgado

et al. 2021

Glob J Flex Syst Manag

157

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Risk management plays a key role in uncertain times, preventing corporations from acting rashly and incorrectly, allowing them to become flexible and resilient. A global turbulence such as the COVID-19 pandemic has had a strong impact on individual companies and entire economic sectors, raising the question of whether a paradigm shift is necessary, in order to enable a new cycle of development that is much environmentally, socially and economically sustainable. This environmental and socio-economic context of profound uncertainty forces organizations to consider more carefully the risk factors affecting their business continuity, as well as how these factors relate to sustainability issues. However, there is a gap in knowledge about how risk management systems relate to sustainability management systems, and how both of them exert influence on business performance, especially from a theoretical point of view. The aim of this study is to address this gap, by developing a new interpretative framework for the analysis of risk management strategies in organizations. This approach has been identified in economic hermeneutics as an innovative methodological tool to improve the knowledge of risk and design the most appropriate management strategies. The paper provides two main results: the first one is the construction of a theoretical model that relates risk management to sustainability management; the second one is an operational framework of multidimensional risk assessment useful for analysis at different levels (business, competitive scenario and system). Finally, the model also makes it possible to carry out a sustainability assessment through risk evaluation in the perspective of the sustainable development goals.

show abstract

“…Product design risk (Palousis et al, 2010;Schulte and Hallstedt, 2018;Rostamzadeh et al, 2018) Risk of production capacity (Rostamzadeh et al, 2018;Sun et al, 2020) Risk in demand (Mangla et al, 2015;Rostamzadeh et al, 2018;Wasim Syed et al, 2019;) Quality risk (Rostamzadeh et al, 2018;Tse et al, 2019) Poor planning (Rostamzadeh et al, 2018) Forecast errors (Rostamzadeh et al, 2018…”

Section: Sustainable Production Risksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk: evidence from the Iranian food industry

Abadi

Darestani

2021

JSTPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The food industry is directly related to the health of humans and society and also that little attention has been paid to the assessment of sustainable supply chain risk management in this area, this will be qualified as an important research area. This study aims to develop a framework for assessing the sustainable supply chain risk management in the realm of the food industry (confectionery and chocolate) with a case study of three generic companies denotes as A1–A3. The proposed risk management was evaluated in three aforementioned manufacturing companies, and these three companies were ranked by the Fuzzy-Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (F-WASPAS) method in EXCEL. Design/methodology/approach The evaluation was carried out using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methods Best-Worst method (BWM)-WASPAS. Via an extensive literature review in the area of sustainable supply chain, sustainable food supply chain and risks in this, 9 risk criteria and 59 sub-criteria of risk were identified. Using expert opinion in the food industry, 8 risk criteria and 39 risk sub-criteria were identified for final evaluation. The final weight of the main and sub-criteria was obtained using the F-BWM method via LINGO software. Risk management in the sustainable supply chain has the role of identifying, analyzing and providing solutions to control risks. Findings The following criteria in each group gained more weight: loss of credibility and brand, dangerous and unhealthy working environment, unproductive use of energy, human error, supplier quality, quality risk, product perishability and security. Among the criteria, the economic risks have the highest weight and among the alternatives, A3 has obtained first ranking. Originality/value Modeling of risk for the food supply chain is the unique contribution of this work.

show abstract

Measuring and Integrating Risk Management into Green Innovation Practices for Green Manufacturing under the Global Value Chain

Cited by 71 publications

References 76 publications

Green Technology and Sustainable Development: Assessment and Green Growth Frameworks

Green Technology and Sustainable Development: Assessment and Green Growth Frameworks

Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times

Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk: evidence from the Iranian food industry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About