1984
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.31.2.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring adjustment to college.

Abstract: Research on a scale measuring adjustment to college is described. A 52-item self-report Likert-type scale, yielding indices of four aspects of adjustment as well as a full-scale score, was administered once each semester in each of 3 successive academic years to samples of freshman students. Reliability data for the scale as a whole and for the several subscales individually are presented, and validity is assessed through examination of the relationship between the subscales and several independent variables e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
343
0
72

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 567 publications
(433 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
12
343
0
72
Order By: Relevance
“…As in Study 1, three scales were administered to tap three dimensions of psychosocial functioning (i.e., depression, self-esteem, and social well-being). These instruments were as follows: (a) a 12-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (Radloff, 1977), the full version of which was used and described in Study 1 (Cronbach's alpha was .79); (b) Rosenberg's (1965) self-esteem scale (see Study 1 for a description; Cronbach's alpha was .90); and (c) a brief 10-item version of the Social Adjustment subscale of the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (Baker & Siryk, 1984), which taps how well students deal with interpersonal experiences at college. Items were answered on a 5-point Likert-type rating scale (ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in Study 1, three scales were administered to tap three dimensions of psychosocial functioning (i.e., depression, self-esteem, and social well-being). These instruments were as follows: (a) a 12-item version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (Radloff, 1977), the full version of which was used and described in Study 1 (Cronbach's alpha was .79); (b) Rosenberg's (1965) self-esteem scale (see Study 1 for a description; Cronbach's alpha was .90); and (c) a brief 10-item version of the Social Adjustment subscale of the Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (Baker & Siryk, 1984), which taps how well students deal with interpersonal experiences at college. Items were answered on a 5-point Likert-type rating scale (ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another perspective is that the first year of university is a year of adjustment (Baker and Siryk 1984) where student well-being is as likely to be linked to social, domestic and financial challenges as academic performance. Strahan (2003) has suggested that institutions vary in the demands that they place on students and thus in the potential for anxieties to impact on adjustment-related well-being and academic performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…이 는 학생들이 학업면, 대인관계 및 사회적 요구와 관련된 사회면, 심리적 또는 신체적인 개인-정서면, 대학환경면 에서 대학생활의 요구에 대처하는 적절한 반응을 뜻한다 [17,18]. 대학생활적응을 측정하기 위해 Baker와 …”
Section: 대학생활적응unclassified