2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring accessibility to parks: Analyzing the relationship between self-reported and calculated measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'s research points to the relationship between one's objective proximity to a green space or the community's green space availability and residents' attachment to place, with a greater proportion of and accessibility to green space likely not improving residents' attachment to their local neighborhood [50]. However, Karl El Murr's study pointed out that there is an inconsistency between subjectively measured accessibility (also known as perceived accessibility) and objectively measured accessibility (i.e., spatial accessibility), with perceived accessibility being positively correlated with spatial accessibility when park attributes are considered, but negatively correlated when the number of parks is considered [27]. A number of studies have shown that perceptual accessibility is more important than spatial accessibility [51][52][53].…”
Section: Correlational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…'s research points to the relationship between one's objective proximity to a green space or the community's green space availability and residents' attachment to place, with a greater proportion of and accessibility to green space likely not improving residents' attachment to their local neighborhood [50]. However, Karl El Murr's study pointed out that there is an inconsistency between subjectively measured accessibility (also known as perceived accessibility) and objectively measured accessibility (i.e., spatial accessibility), with perceived accessibility being positively correlated with spatial accessibility when park attributes are considered, but negatively correlated when the number of parks is considered [27]. A number of studies have shown that perceptual accessibility is more important than spatial accessibility [51][52][53].…”
Section: Correlational Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, with the in-depth study of spatial accessibility theories, the related evaluation models have become more complex. Some scholars have found that the evaluation results based on spatial accessibility do not fully reflect the actual accessibility situation; that is, there is a discrepancy between the evaluation results and the individual's perception of accessibility [27]. In the Netherlands, a study revealed that, while the average perceived accessibility was higher in rural areas, approximately 12% of the population reported a perception of somewhat lower accessibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have confirmed the existence of the spatial inequity of PGS accessibility among different age groups [17,19,20], races [21], social statuses [22], and education levels [23]. Significant spatial disparities in accessibility are affected by both objective factors such as physical distance [24], the characteristics of PGSs [25], and environmental safety [26] and by subjective factors such as personal preference and travel mode [18]. Existing studies have also drawn consistent suggestions on the equity optimization of existing PGSs, mainly including improving traffic convenience [9,27], increasing entrances [28], building small PGSs [6,29], improving the quality of PGSs [29], government policy adjustment [30], and improving PGSs for groups [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, a review of active travel and environmental correlates found that the presence of parks and other play areas in neighborhoods was often positively associated with children’s active travel ( 7 , 8 ). Further, having a range of parks accessible can increase the diversity of possible gathering points as well as possible activities (as each park may have different equipment) and increase the likelihood that a park is within range of two friends living in different locations ( 9 ). Considering local accessibility on foot and by bicycle to a diversity of destinations beyond simply schools is therefore of relevance to support land-use and transport planning that consider children’s overall needs and well-being.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%