Spatial Optimization of Park Green Spaces by an Improved Two-Step Optimization Model from the Perspective of Maximizing Accessibility Equity

Abstract

As a type of public land, park green spaces (PGSs) carry the daily recreation and social communication of urban residents, and the inequity of their space accessibility has been widely confirmed. However, the optimized suggestions based on evaluations of accessibility and equity in previous studies cannot guide actual planning effectively because the reasonable locations and scales of construction of PGSs were difficult to accurately identify. This study first constructed two equity objective functions: the minimum standard deviation (SD) and the minimum Gini coefficient (GC) in accessibility; then an improved two-step optimization method considering location-allocation was adopted to maximal accessibility equity (MAE) for optimizing the spatial layout of PGSs and doing comparisons of these two objectives for further analysis. The results showed that the improved method based on covering the accessibility blind area and preserving the existing PGSs could optimize the location selection and rationally determine the area. The two objective functions were both effective for optimization, but the GC minimization is more advantageous than the SD for achieving the MAE. The accessibility value increased significantly in a higher proportion of regions, and the overall accessibility median increased by 0.0445. It is worth mentioning that the MAE optimization would lead to a new imbalance between supply and demand in some regions. This indicated that the strictly restricted area standard may lead to the oversupply of PGSs in some areas, while the improvement of equity might not mean the improvement of accessibility. The proposed optimization framework could achieve the optimal layout of PGSs on the goal of MAE. Our findings also could provide inspiration for the equity allocation of other types of public facility lands and support decision-making for government departments regarding management and planning.

Optimal site selection strategies for urban parks green spaces under the joint perspective of spatial equity and social equity

“…Therefore, this improved accessibility model ensures its potential replicability and convenience when applied in other cities. On the demand side of UPGS, the area and entrance information of the UPGS is obtained by web-crawled AOI combined with offline research to ensure the reliability of the data compared with manual depiction and purely offline survey ( 54 , 58 , 70 ); the population of the community is accepted as the product of the population of the administrative unit accurate to the neighborhood, and the number of households, instead of the population estimation of the homogenized distribution with the minimum unit of the district ( 71 ); and the socioeconomic level of the residents is obtained by using web-crawled community house prices as the estimation index, which ensures the heterogeneity and accuracy of each community point compared to some social equity studies that ignore group distribution patterns ( 45 ). In conclusion, the UPGS is statistically improved in both supply-side and demand-side measurements and data.…”