2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2085-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring academic research impact: creating a citation profile using the conceptual framework for implementation fidelity as a case study

Christopher Carroll
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sample, the research articles are cited twice in 8/75 (11%) and three or more times in 14/75 (17%). This suggests that impact generally is very limited, but is perhaps consistent with known figures for academic research impact (Carroll, 2016).…”
Section: Weight Of Impact: Citation Counts In the Policy Documentssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sample, the research articles are cited twice in 8/75 (11%) and three or more times in 14/75 (17%). This suggests that impact generally is very limited, but is perhaps consistent with known figures for academic research impact (Carroll, 2016).…”
Section: Weight Of Impact: Citation Counts In the Policy Documentssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This facilitated further analysis: a verification of the numbers of policy documents listed as citing the research article and an assessment of how many times the research article was cited within a document. This latter score provides greater depth and context to the citation metric (Carroll, 2016). The analysis of the available data principally consisted of the tabulation and discussion of descriptive statistics and frequencies, e.g., the reporting of numbers of relevant research articles cited in policy documents; the categorization of these articles by academic faculty or field; the numbers and sources of policy documents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the citation context is considered in the bibliometric analyses to have more specific information on the impact of publications and how cited publications are perceived (Small et al 2017 ). Carroll ( 2016 ) takes into account “the frequency with which the paper is cited within citing publications … adding depth and value to the citation metric” (p. 1329). The results of Hu et al ( 2015 ) show that successive citations in papers are more intentional and reasonable than first-time citations—if papers are cited multiple times in a paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A citation in the discussion section is frequently about comparable results (Hu et al, 2015). A document might be cited more than once at different places in the citing document for different reasons (Carroll, 2016). Hu et al (2015) show that for a repeatedly cited document, its first-time citation is usually perfunctory, unlike the later citations (see section 3.2.1).…”
Section: Location and Number Of Citationsmentioning
confidence: 99%