Measures of perceived work characteristics for health services research: Test of a measurement model and normative data

Abstract

Objectives. The aim of this paper is to describe the development and refinement of nine measures of perceived work characteristics for use in studies of the psychological wellbeing of health services employees. The constructs measured are: autonomy/control, feedback, influence, leader support, professional compromise, role clarity, role conflict, peer support and work demands. Design. The study was a large scale cross‐sectional survey. Methods. National Health Service Trust staff were selected from seven major occupational groups (nurses, doctors, administrative staff, managers, professions allied to medicine, professional and technical staff, and ancillary staff) within a sample of Trusts chosen to be representative of those in England. Questionnaires incorporating the scale items were completed by over 9,000 staff. The fit with the a priori nine‐dimensional measurement model was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. Scale internal reliabilities and norms were calculated, and aspects of construct validity were examined. Results. The findings show a good fit to the measurement model for the sample as a whole and across occupational groups. All the scales exhibit acceptable internal reliabilities; and normative data is provided for all seven occupations (with norms for more specific job categories available on request). Analyses suggest good construct validity, showing the scales discriminate as anticipated across occupational groups and job categories, and they have the expected relationships with job satisfaction and psychological strain. Conclusions. The measures developed are usable for research purposes across the major occupational groups, with the possible exception of ancillary staff. Further work is desirable to confirm the measurement properties and extend the normative database.

An evaluation of foundation doctor training: a mixed-methods study of the impact on workforce well-being and patient care [the Evaluating the Impact of Doctors in Training (EDiT) study]

“…80 The coefficient alpha for task feedback ranged from 0.82 (T1) to 0.90 (T3, T4). This compares well with the reliabilities of 0.80-0.87 with health-care samples in the study by Haynes et al 81 The coefficient alpha for role clarity ranged from 0.85 (T1, T4) to 0.87 (T2). This compares well with the reliabilities of 0.76-0.90 with health-care samples in the study by Szilagyi et al 82 There was evidence of statistically significant variation across the four time points in mean scores for both work demands (F 3,393 = 10, p < 0.005) and role clarity (F 3,389 = 6.5, p < 0.005).…”

“…This compares well with quoted reliabilities for each relational scale of 0.90-0.92 with health-care samples. 81 There was no statistically significant variation in mean sample scores for reported support from either CSs or colleagues across the four placement periods (see Appendix 19, Table 32). There was a statistically significant interaction between time of placement in the ED and mean support from colleagues (F 6,390 = 3.4, p < 0.005).…”

Shift work and age as interactive predictors of body mass index among offshore workers

“…Two points argue against this explanation for the present findings. First, substantial variation in psychosocial work measures is attributable to broad differences between different types of jobs (25,45,46). Thus, in the present study, the inclusion of job type in the predictive model served to control for much of the potential effect of psychosocial work factors.…”

Building and sustaining work engagement – a participatory action intervention to increase work engagement in nursing staff

“…A four-item measure developed for use in health service settings (Haynes, Wall, Bolden, & Stride, 1999). A sample item is: "To what extent are you allowed to participate in decisions which affect you?".…”