2014
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.2314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Molten Steel Surface Velocity and Effect of Stopper-rod Movement on Transient Multiphase Fluid Flow in Continuous Casting

Abstract: Surface velocity of the molten steel in the mold is critical to final product quality during continuous casting of steel, and is one of the few flow parameters that can be measured in the plant to validate fluid flow models. Surface velocity was measured using two different sensors: Sub-meniscus Velocity Control (SVC) devices and nail dipping, to evaluate their performance, and to quantify surface velocities in a commercial steel caster under different casting speeds, argon gas fractions, and mold widths. A co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…empirical formula (4) yields the correct trend in the increase of the critical velocity with increasing oil viscosity; however, the calculated values are unrealistically large. The closest to the author's investigation results is empirical model (5). The discrepancies between the author's investigations and other empirical models provided in the literature can be explained by the following factors: the different experimental technique employed, the differences in interfacial boundary geometry and the sensitivity of the phenomenon in question on the interfacial tension and liquids viscosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…empirical formula (4) yields the correct trend in the increase of the critical velocity with increasing oil viscosity; however, the calculated values are unrealistically large. The closest to the author's investigation results is empirical model (5). The discrepancies between the author's investigations and other empirical models provided in the literature can be explained by the following factors: the different experimental technique employed, the differences in interfacial boundary geometry and the sensitivity of the phenomenon in question on the interfacial tension and liquids viscosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For this reason, the behaviour of liquid slag layer on the liquid steel surface in mould is an important and often investigated problem of modern continuous steel casting process. The research take different forms, including plant measurements [4,5], investigations -basing on the similarity numbers: Webber (We), Froude (Fr), Reynolds (Re) and Capillary (Ca) -using the oil-water physical models [6,7] and also numerical simulations [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean and variations of the surface velocities are very close to but slightly lower than previous measurements by Yavuz with a wider mold width, which leads to higher surface velocities under the same casting speed. This observation is in line with previous work by Liu and Thomas …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With higher gas fractions, it is more accurate to solve an extra continuity equation and complete extra set of transport equations for the gas phase, coupled together with the fluid continuity and transport equations, in order to enforce the total volume fraction to equal 100% everywhere. This Eulerian–Eulerian approach has been applied successfully in many previous studies of argon‐steel flow in the continuous casting mold region . Asymmetric, oscillating flow is observed if gas fractions are excessive .…”
Section: Fluid Flow Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational models of the nozzle have included the slide-gate, [62][63][64] the stopper rod, [65,66] or the refractory-funnelnozzle semi-open-pouring flow control system, [67] which greatly affects the flow in both the nozzle and the mold cavity. [68] Many models have simulated the important effects of argon gas injection on turbulent flow inside the nozzle, [62][63][64] and also in the mold.…”
Section: Fluid Flow In the Nozzlementioning
confidence: 99%