1953
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.91.765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of Meson Masses and Related Quantities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculations by Jackson and McCarthy [27] confirmed that negative particles lose energy at a slower rate, with the difference dropping from tens of percent at MeV energies to about 0.3% in the GeV range. These calculations were subsequently verified experimentally both at MeV energies [28,29,30] and in the GeV range [31]. The approximations used in [27], however, break down when going to even higher energies and so more exact numerical methods are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Calculations by Jackson and McCarthy [27] confirmed that negative particles lose energy at a slower rate, with the difference dropping from tens of percent at MeV energies to about 0.3% in the GeV range. These calculations were subsequently verified experimentally both at MeV energies [28,29,30] and in the GeV range [31]. The approximations used in [27], however, break down when going to even higher energies and so more exact numerical methods are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Above the cavern hall lies 72.1 m of Dolomite/Shale bedrock with a density of 2.41 g/cm 3 , followed by 22.2 m of Glacial till with a density of 2.29 g/cm 3 . It has been suggested in [7] that at the MINOS Near Detector depth the slightly higher rate of energy loss of µ + over µ − [25][26][27][28][29][30] could lead to a surface charge ratio that is slightly higher than that observed underground. However, as the magnitude of this effect is negligible when compared to the systematic uncertainties of this measurement we have assumed the same energy loss function for both charges.…”
Section: The Atmospheric Muon Charge Ratio At the Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When possible, these charge-sign-dependent effects provide a key test of our understanding. The first indications of such a dependence came from the work of Barkas and coworkers [6], who observed different ranges for positive and negative pions in matter. Initially this observation was attributed to a difference in the pion masses, but latter it was demonstrated that it is due to higher-order contributions to the energy loss rate or stopping power [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%