1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4073(77)90063-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements of broadening of argon lines and oscillator strengths of resonance lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method is somewhat uncertain, however, because the reported collisional broadening parameters, C c have rather large discrepancies. Vallee et al reported C c = 1.51 × 10 −37 m 4 K −0.3 at T = 3900 K [38]. In our previous work [32], the measured value was C c = 2.54 × 10 −37 m 4 K −0.3 at T = 340 K. In this work, the reported gas temperature by laser diode absorption was comparable to the OH rotational temperature if the value of Vallee et al was used.…”
Section: Ar(1s 5 ) Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is somewhat uncertain, however, because the reported collisional broadening parameters, C c have rather large discrepancies. Vallee et al reported C c = 1.51 × 10 −37 m 4 K −0.3 at T = 3900 K [38]. In our previous work [32], the measured value was C c = 2.54 × 10 −37 m 4 K −0.3 at T = 340 K. In this work, the reported gas temperature by laser diode absorption was comparable to the OH rotational temperature if the value of Vallee et al was used.…”
Section: Ar(1s 5 ) Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if conventional RPA correction (Eq.1) is included, the difference is also large, though of an opposite sign. And only 1 # Reference Year f 1s4 f 1s2 1 Lewis [13] 1967 0.063±0.003 0.278±0.020 2 Lawrence [14] 1968 0.059±0.003 0.228±0.021 3 Geiger [15] 1970 0.047±0.009 0.186±0.037 4 de Jongh and Eck [16] 1971 0.22±0.02 5 Irwin et al [17] 1973 0.083±0.027 0.35±0.13 6 McConkey and Donaldson [18] 1973 0.096±0.002 7 Copley and Camm [19] 1974 0.076±0.008 0.283±0.024 8 Vallee et al [20] 1977 0.051±0.007 0.210±0.030 9 Westerveld et al [21] 1979 0.063±0.005 0.240±0.020 10 Hahn and Schwentner [22] 1980 0.077±0.004 0.361±0.060 11 Chornay et al [23] 1984 0.065±0.005 12 Li et al [24] 1988 0.058 IV is denoted by letters in accordance with the NIST convention: for example, the accuracy of class "C" is about 10%. Still in the case of the p −1 3/2 4s-p −1 3/2 4p transition the disagreement is quite large and independent of RPA corrections which might indicate that the problem is in the experiment.…”
Section: Argon Transitions Between Excited Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28 -31]. Several alternative experimental methods that have avoided the line-saturation problem have been employed to determine discrete optical oscillator strengths of argon, such as self-absorption [16,23,27], lifetime [12,14,17,24], pressure-broadening profile [13,19,20], and electron-impact-based methods [1,15,18,21,22,25,26]. It should be mentioned that these techniques are somewhat complex and are often severely restricted in their range of application except for the electron-impact-based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%