2003
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/36/10/310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theoretical energies and transition probabilities of argon

Abstract: Argon energies of J=1 odd and J=2 even states, oscillator strengths of the two lowest J=1 odd states, and line strengths for transitions between J=1 odd and J=2 even excited states are calculated with the CI+MBPT method. The results are in good agreement with experiment.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second-order effects should be smaller, but they should be done carefully because there is strong cancellation between large terms. In our previous work we found that if second-order effects are added in the correct way, agreement for a large number of OSs and energies is achieved [4][5][6][7]. The evaluation of error discussed in this section is quite approximate, and a better evaluation of the theory is obtained by comparison with experiment for multiple atoms and wavelengths.…”
Section: B Evaluation Of Error In Calculations Due To Second-order Ementioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second-order effects should be smaller, but they should be done carefully because there is strong cancellation between large terms. In our previous work we found that if second-order effects are added in the correct way, agreement for a large number of OSs and energies is achieved [4][5][6][7]. The evaluation of error discussed in this section is quite approximate, and a better evaluation of the theory is obtained by comparison with experiment for multiple atoms and wavelengths.…”
Section: B Evaluation Of Error In Calculations Due To Second-order Ementioning
confidence: 80%
“…The CI + RMBPT approach is difficult to apply to particle-hole states of closed-shell atoms due to poor convergence of RMBPT. Previously, we developed a reliable particle-hole CI + RMBPT approach for noble-gas atoms and demonstrated agreement with experiment for energies, oscillator strengths [4][5][6][7], and g factors [8]. This theory can be applied to calculations of polarizabilities and Verdet constants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The CI+MBPT method was successfully used for a number of atoms with two or three valence electrons [16,17,22] (or an electron and a hole [20,21]). Its extension to atoms with more electrons in open shells meets some difficulties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more general R-matrix approach has been used, but owing to the complexity of implementation, it is not easy to incorporate into existing precision atomic-structure methods to systematically improve accuracy. Configuration-interaction relativistic-manybody-theory (CI-RMBPT) formalism has been successful in predicting energies, matrix elements, and other properties of bound states of atoms [3][4][5][6], which is quite promising, but it has not applied to photoionization problems owing to extra complications arising from continuum states. In this paper a method is introduced to convert discrete CI-(R)MPBT oscillator strengths (OS) to photoionization cross sections with minimal modifications of the codes and CI-RMBPT cross sections are computed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These atoms are chosen for the following reasons: (1) noble-gas atom photoionization cross sections have been measured with high precision; (2) the number of particle-hole configurations is relatively small, facilitating the investigation of the effects of various parameters on the accuracy; (3) an accurate particle-hole CI+MBPT method has been previously developed for these atoms with agreement demonstrated for energies, oscillator strengths, and g-factors [6]; and (4) these atoms are of considerable interest for applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%