2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2011.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements and theories of the King–Perkins–Chudakov effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is more accurate to use the calculated value of E MP , rather than E AV , for comparison with experimental results obtained with the use of thin detectors. Particularly, it is shown that although this does not completely remove the discrepancy between the results of the experiment [22,23] and the theory, it provides a much better coincidence in the part of the investigated region of parameters where the Chudakov effect is the most significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is more accurate to use the calculated value of E MP , rather than E AV , for comparison with experimental results obtained with the use of thin detectors. Particularly, it is shown that although this does not completely remove the discrepancy between the results of the experiment [22,23] and the theory, it provides a much better coincidence in the part of the investigated region of parameters where the Chudakov effect is the most significant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The Chudakov effect has been studied experimentally with the use of cosmic ray photons for pair production in emulsions [13,16,17], which showed a fairly good agreement with the theories of this effect for the mean ionization loss of the pair [12,[18][19][20][21]. In [22,23] there was reported the first proof-of principle experiment of this kind, where the photons were generated by high-energy electrons in an accelerator. It was noted that such an approach allows for much more precise determination of the pair energy and achievement of better statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us also note that the problem statement considered in [11] and [14] probably better corresponds to the experimental situation of the first accelerator-based investigation of pair ionization loss [9,10] in which the pairs loss was measured in thin silicon detector situated on different distances from golden foils in which the pairs were created by high-energy photons. Taking into account the contribution from transition radiation leads to somewhat better description of the obtained here results than the one provided by theories of pair ionization loss in boundless medium [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ionization energy loss of an ultra relativistic electron-positron pair created by a high-energy photon in substance has been studied in series of works both theoretically [1][2][3][4][5] and experimentally [6][7][8][9][10]. Its main peculiarity is associated with existence of socalled Chudakov effect which consists in reduction of pair ionization loss in the vicinity of its creation point comparing to the sum of losses of electron and positron which traverse the substance separately one from another.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%