2011
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurements and computation of low mass transfer coefficients for FCC particles with ozone decomposition reaction

Abstract: in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).The mass transfer coefficients and Sherwood numbers for catalyzed fluid cracking catalyst particles were measured and computed in a two-dimensional (2-D) bubbling fluidized bed, with ozone decomposition reaction. The measured and computed Sherwood numbers, using 3-and 2-D kinetic theory based computational fluid dynamics simulations, were of the order of 10 À6 -10 À2. The low Sherwood numbers were in reasonable agreement with the literature data for small partic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, by assuming a homogeneous system, e.g., ideal plug flow, overestimation of the conversion rate in heterogeneous systems is likely to result. The contact efficiency could be determined by assuming a riser as a steady-state plug flow reactor: 24 , 25 , 48 , 50 , 63 with a solution: where s is the averaged solids volume fraction in a slice of thickness Δz , U the gas superficial velocity, K ov the apparent volumetric reaction rate constant, γ pf a gas–solid contact efficiency, and Da the Damköhler number defined as The gas–solid contact efficiency γ pf could be computed at different axial increments of Δz , by quantifying the contact efficiency as the ratio between the apparent conversion rate and the conversion obtained when a 1D plug flow model is assumed, ignoring any heterogeneity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Otherwise, by assuming a homogeneous system, e.g., ideal plug flow, overestimation of the conversion rate in heterogeneous systems is likely to result. The contact efficiency could be determined by assuming a riser as a steady-state plug flow reactor: 24 , 25 , 48 , 50 , 63 with a solution: where s is the averaged solids volume fraction in a slice of thickness Δz , U the gas superficial velocity, K ov the apparent volumetric reaction rate constant, γ pf a gas–solid contact efficiency, and Da the Damköhler number defined as The gas–solid contact efficiency γ pf could be computed at different axial increments of Δz , by quantifying the contact efficiency as the ratio between the apparent conversion rate and the conversion obtained when a 1D plug flow model is assumed, ignoring any heterogeneity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 45 Some of these computational studies have suggested that global scale mass-transfer resistances are related to cluster formation. 20 , 25 , 46 However, these findings are not explicitly supported with cluster scale level computations, such as the instantaneous gas–solid contact efficiency of particle clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[31][32][33] Their main difference compared with the fluidized beds 34 is that solid particles are fixed in the reactor. Thus, it is difficult to describe fluid flow in detail among packed particles because of the complex geometrical structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1988, the explanation of the velocity distribution in a large riser diameter used in EXXON Company and the small riser used in the IIT laboratory was an initial step to modernize the method for multiphase CFD codes to design fluidized bed reactors with reasonable confidence to flow regimes. For fluidized bed reactor design, Breault, Chalermsinsuwan et al, Kashyap and Gidaspow and others explained the 50‐year‐old puzzle of the low Sherwood and Nusselt numbers in fluidized beds. They are below the theoretical limit of two due to the formation of particle clusters in risers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%