2016
DOI: 10.1097/jom.0000000000000752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement Tools for Integrated Worker Health Protection and Promotion

Abstract: The measurement tools studied were feasible, acceptable, and meaningful to companies in the SafeWell study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…McLellan et al, 2015; Pember et al, 2015; Pronk et al, 2016). Results indicate that both employee-rated health culture and safety culture improved in two companies, self-reported back pain decreased in one company and remained the same in two; safety hazards were reduced in all companies; and organizational resources, as measured by the CDC Worksite Health Scorecard and related to organizational support, physical activity and nutrition, all improved across all companies (Pronk et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…McLellan et al, 2015; Pember et al, 2015; Pronk et al, 2016). Results indicate that both employee-rated health culture and safety culture improved in two companies, self-reported back pain decreased in one company and remained the same in two; safety hazards were reduced in all companies; and organizational resources, as measured by the CDC Worksite Health Scorecard and related to organizational support, physical activity and nutrition, all improved across all companies (Pronk et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also used our conceptual model to design an integrated intervention in response to specific settings and conditions of work, based on a systematic assessment approach conducted within organizations (Pronk et al, 2016). We tested the feasibility of the intervention in three small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) in manufacturing in Minnesota.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variables, or outcomes, similarly include organizational changes in these same workplaces, along with health, behavioral, attitudinal, and other characteristics of the workers that might demonstrate the impact of the intervention. 58 Measures may be obtained at the organizational level from a worksite representative or at the worker level through an employee survey. Outcome measures focused on the organizational level may include new worksite programs, policies, and practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chan School of Public Health Center for Work, Health and Well-being, com vistas a avaliar a integração das polí-ticas e dos programas de saúde e segurança ocupacional nos ambientes de trabalho das empresas mencionadas. Posteriormente, outros estudos foram desenvolvidos junto a companhias dos setores da construção, da indústria e da saúde, ampliando a compreensão da aplicabilidade do DCSS em diferentes atividades econômicas [7][8][9][10] . Diferentemente de outros instrumentos disponíveis para a avaliação da saúde e da segurança no trabalho, o DCSS analisa os problemas associados a esses fatores como resultados das políticas, dos programas e das condições de trabalho vigentes, propondo a análise desses elementos no sentido de propiciar iniciativas que integrem os diferentes níveis organizacionais e setores de uma empresa como forma de equacionar possíveis problemas de maneira sistêmica 4 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…• Employee participation; • Administration and supervision; • Planning and evaluation; e • Summary scoring 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%