Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Gagnier, Joel; Huang, Hsiaomin; Mullins, Megan; Marinac‐Dabic, Danica; Ghambaryan, Anna; Eloff, Benjamin C.; Mirza, Faisal M.; Bayona, Manuel

doi:10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00038

Cited by 32 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 94 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) play an important role in understanding the patient's perspective on the impact of hip osteoarthritis (OA) and other hip disorders and their treatment 1 . One of the most widely-used hip-specific PROMs is the 40-item Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) 2 , which was developed to measure the impact of hip disability in patients with hip osteoarthritis 3 and non-arthritis hip disorders 4 . HOOS has the advantage of providing domain-specific measures of Pain, Symptoms, Function (Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport/ Recreation), and Quality of Llife (QOL), but its respondent burden has been viewed as too great for routine use in registries or clinical care.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness

Gandek

Roos

Franklin

et al. 2019

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To evaluate reliability, validity and responsiveness of HOOS-12, a 12-item short form of the 40item Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). HOOS-12 provides Pain, Function and Quality of Life (QOL) scale scores and a summary hip impact score. Design: Data from 1,273 FORCE-TJR hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients who completed HOOS before and six and 12 months after total hip replacement (THR) were analyzed. HOOS-12 includes a pain frequency item and three items measuring pain during increasingly difficult (sitting/lying, walking, stairs) activities; function items about standing, rising from sitting, getting in/out of a car, and walking on an uneven surface; and the 4-item HOOS QOL scale. Percent computable scale scores, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency reliability, validity (scale correlations, tests of known groups validity using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)), and responsiveness (effect sizes (ES), standardized response means (SRM)) were compared for HOOS-12, full-length HOOS, HOOS-PS and HOOS, JR. Results: Internal consistency reliability was above 0.70 for all HOOS-12 scales and above 0.90 for the HOOS-12 Summary score. Validity and responsiveness of HOOS-12 Pain, Function and QOL scales were satisfactory and reached similar conclusions as comparable full-length HOOS scales. The HOOS-12 Summary score was highly responsive in discriminating between groups who differed in global ratings of post-THR change in physical capabilities and had high ES and SRM standardized response means. Conclusions: HOOS-12 was a reliable and valid alternative to HOOS in THR patients with moderate to severe OA and provided three domain-specific and summary hip impact scores with substantially reduced respondent burden.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness

Gandek

Roos

Franklin

et al. 2019

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After duplicate removals, 102 articles were screened from titles and abstracts. Fourteen full texts were selected 13–26. Eight literature reviews were excluded and six were included (see articles in table 1).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient-reported outcome measures for hip-related pain: a review of the available evidence and a consensus statement from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hip-related pain is a well-recognised complaint among active young and middle-aged active adults. People experiencing hip-related disorders commonly report pain and reduced functional capacity, including difficulties in executing activities of daily living. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to accurately examine and compare the effects of different treatments on disability in those with hip pain. In November 2018, 38 researchers and clinicians working in the field of hip-related pain met in Zurich, Switzerland for the first International Hip-related Pain Research Network meeting. Prior to the meeting, evidence summaries were developed relating to four prioritised themes. This paper discusses the available evidence and consensus process from which recommendations were made regarding the appropriate use of PROMs to assess disability in young and middle-aged active adults with hip-related pain. Our process to gain consensus had five steps: (1) systematic review of systematic reviews; (2) preliminary discussion within the working group; (3) update of the more recent high-quality systematic review and examination of the psychometric properties of PROMs according to established guidelines; (4) formulation of the recommendations considering the limitations of the PROMs derived from the examination of their quality; and (5) voting and consensus. Out of 102 articles retrieved, 6 systematic reviews were selected and assessed for quality according to AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews). Two showed moderate quality. We then updated the most recent review. The updated literature search resulted in 10 additional studies that were included in the qualitative synthesis. The recommendations based on evidence summary and PROMs limitations were presented at the consensus meeting. The group makes the following recommendations: (1) the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) and the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) instruments (long and reduced versions) are the most appropriate PROMs to use in young and middle-aged active adults with hip-related pain; (2) more research is needed into the utility of the HAGOS and the iHOT instruments in a non-surgical treatment context; and (3) generic quality of life measures such as the EuroQoL-5 Dimension Questionnaire and the Short Form Health Survey-36 may add value for researchers and clinicians in this field. We conclude that as none of the instruments shows acceptable quality across various psychometric properties, more methods studies are needed to further evaluate the validity of these PROMS—the HAGOS and iHOT—as well as the other (currently not recommended) PROMS.

show abstract

“…The HOOS can be used for younger and more active patients given the subscales and individual domains. The HOOS has shown favorable qualities in reviews of psychometric properties in assessment of patients after THA, hip arthroscopy, and periacetabular osteotomy and patients with hip osteoarthritis not undergoing surgery .…”

Section: Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scorementioning

confidence: 99%

Measures of Hip Function and Symptoms

Weick

Bullard

Green

et al. 2020

Arthritis Care & Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract: Despite a large number of included studies, many had low COSMIN ratings. We recommend additional rigorous studies to explore the psychometric properties of these instruments. Furthermore, the development of a core outcome set for total hip arthroplasty clinical trials is needed.

Cited by 32 publications

References 94 publications

A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness

A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness

Patient-reported outcome measures for hip-related pain: a review of the available evidence and a consensus statement from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018

Measures of Hip Function and Symptoms

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About