2020
DOI: 10.1002/acr.24231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measures of Hip Function and Symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gait of the children was observed, and physical examination was performed. We also evaluated the weight‐bearing joint function based on Constant–Murley functional assessment of the shoulder, 10 Mayo clinic performance index for the elbow, 11 Cooney wrist score, 12 Harris hip score, 13 Lysholm knee function scoring scale, 14 and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle‐hindfoot scale 15 . The anteroposterior and lateral X‐ray of both knees were obtained to assess joint abnormality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gait of the children was observed, and physical examination was performed. We also evaluated the weight‐bearing joint function based on Constant–Murley functional assessment of the shoulder, 10 Mayo clinic performance index for the elbow, 11 Cooney wrist score, 12 Harris hip score, 13 Lysholm knee function scoring scale, 14 and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle‐hindfoot scale 15 . The anteroposterior and lateral X‐ray of both knees were obtained to assess joint abnormality.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint-related disability was measured using the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score (KOOS) ( www.koos.nu ). Normalised scores ranging from 0 (extreme disability) to 100 (no disability) were calculated according to scoring instructions ( www.koos.nu ), and a change of 10 points was considered a meaningful change [ 39 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total score of <70 is considered a poor result, 70–80 fair, 80–90 good, and 90–100 excellent. 20 In this study, we classified patients into HHS score ≥90 (patients with excellent prognosis) and <90 points (patients with referred to poor prognosis). 21…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%