Measurement of urban-rural integration level and its spatial differentiation in China in the new century

Yang, Yuanyuan; Bao, Wenkai; Wang, Yongsheng; Liu, Yansui

doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102420

Cited by 100 publications

(97 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[50][51][52]. This is the most realistic basis for the integrated development of urban and rural areas and is the inevitable path to realize China's rural revitalization strategy [2,53].…”

Section: Association Between Rural Land Use Transition and Urid's Pro...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China

Zhi-heng

Shen

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integrated development in urban and rural areas has led to a new form of urban–rural interdependence, which promotes rural territorial functional evolution and land use changes. Rural land use transition, showing the synchronous development between cities and villages, is an important window through which to observe integrated development in urban and rural areas. We focus on uncovering the association between rural land use transition and urban–rural integration development (URID), put forward a dynamic relationship assumption between rural land use transformation and URID stages based on the transmission mechanism of urban–rural linkages, and undertake empirical analysis using the panel regression model with the data of county-level administrative units in Shandong Province, China. The results show that rural land use transition has maintained a close association with URID, and that the changes in cultivated land, forest land, and surface-water area are highly related to URID. There are different leading urban–rural linkages in rural areas around big-sized cities, mid-sized cities, and small-sized cities, which determine whether rural areas are in different URID stages of high, medium, or low levels. Further, rural areas can take different actions to promote URID at different stages through strengthening or introducing urban–rural linkages driven by economies of scale and deepening urbanization. This provides a reference for developing countries to formulate rural land use policies on achieving the goal of URID.

show abstract

“…[50][51][52]. This is the most realistic basis for the integrated development of urban and rural areas and is the inevitable path to realize China's rural revitalization strategy [2,53].…”

Section: Association Between Rural Land Use Transition and Urid's Pro...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China

Zhi-heng

Shen

et al. 2021

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The URID in China has been promoted during the process of rapid urbanization and industrialization, especially after their reform and opening. As for the URID level, research has demonstrated that the overall URID level in China from 2000 to 2018 exhibited a U-shaped curve, with 2006 as the inflection point that was characterized by significant spatial agglomeration [ 27 ]. Another study in China from 2005 to 2016 indicated that the URID level had improved since 2005 and was characterized by spatial agglomeration [ 29 ].…”

Section: Theoretical Analysis and Hypothesismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The quantitative measurement of the URID level is a key first step. A basis–driver–goal framework was built and applied to make the evaluation index system, which further measured the regional differentiation and explored the spatiotemporal evolution of the URID levels in China from 2000 to 2018 [ 27 ]. Another multidimensional evaluation index system based on the people–space–economy–society–ecology for urban-rural integration analyzed the URID levels in China from 1999 to 2016 [ 28 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spatiotemporal Pattern of Urban-Rural Integration Development and Its Driving Mechanism Analysis in Hangzhou Bay Urban Agglomeration

Qian

Yang

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quantitative analysis of the urban-rural integration development (URID) level and its driving factors is of great significance for the new-type urbanization of urban agglomerations. This study constructed a multidimensional framework in the perspective of a population–space–economy–society–ecology framework to measure the URID level from 2000 to 2020 and further explored the driving mechanism of the URID changes by a geographical detector model in the Hangzhou Bay urban agglomeration (HBUA). The results showed that the land-use change in the HBUA from 2000 to 2020 showed a typical characteristic of the transition between cultivated and construction land. The URID level in the HBUA improved from 0.294 in 2000 to 0.563 in 2020, and the year 2005 may have been the inflection point of URID in the HBUA. The URID level showed a significant spatial aggregation with high values. Hangzhou, Jiaxing, and Ningbo were hot spots since 2015, and the cold spots were Huzhou and Shaoxing. The population and spatial integration had more important impacts on URID levels in 2000, 2005, and 2020, while economic and social integration had more significant impacts on URID levels in 2010 and 2015. This study provided a deeper understanding of the evolution of URID in an urban agglomeration and could be used as a reference for decision makers.

show abstract

“…Yan et al (2018) [ 9 ] established a theoretical framework to analyze the formation of urban-rural mixed community by considering the entire cell as a grid unit, and the results revealed that urban-rural mixed community can be regarded as a micro-unit in achieving URI. Recent study by Yang et al (2021) [ 10 ] developed a conceptual framework based on the URI system, and URI index was proposed to measure the regional differentiation. It was found that the overall URI in China kept a low level, and spatial agglomeration from URI index showed as high in the east and low of the western and central regions.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating interaction pattern between urban-rural integration and transport network: A dynamic evolution model

Xiao

2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the progress of urbanization and urban-rural integration (URI), the interaction between URI and urban-rural transport network is becoming stronger, thus it is necessary to investigate the interactive relationship between URI and transport network. By assuming certain functions and principles, evolution model was proposed to explain the relationship between URI space development scale and urban-rural transport network scale, and then by considering the interaction between URI and transport network, dynamic evolution model was presented. Stability analysis was performed to verify the interaction relations with three patterns and elasticity simulation provided the optimal value of urban-rural transport network scale configuration. The results may provide potential insights on URI development and transport network.

show abstract

Measurement of urban-rural integration level and its spatial differentiation in China in the new century

Cited by 100 publications

References 31 publications

Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China

Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China

Spatiotemporal Pattern of Urban-Rural Integration Development and Its Driving Mechanism Analysis in Hangzhou Bay Urban Agglomeration

Investigating interaction pattern between urban-rural integration and transport network: A dynamic evolution model

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About