2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00367.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of Ultraviolet Exposure in Epidemiological Studies of Skin and Skin Cancers

Abstract: As our understanding of the role of UV in causing skin cancer continues to expand, researchers and clinicians must continue to remain up to date on the various means by which UV exposure can be quantified. The purpose of this article was to review the current methods used to measure lifetime exposure to UV and to summarize the strengths and weaknesses of each of these approaches. Thus we include here a review of research articles that deal with questionnaire reliability and physical examination. We also review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Silicon rubber imprints of the skin at the back of the hand were taken to measure past environmental UVR exposure. 15 Microtopography is one of the most common and reliable methods for examining cumulative sun exposure; casts were prepared according to standard procedures using kits from Affinis (C6601, Coltène, OH, USA) and graded from 1 to 6 by the Beagley-Gibson system. 15 Day-to-day environmental UVR exposure for all participants during the first 60 days of the study was measured using a wrist dosimeter (Scienterra Limited, Otago, New Zealand) that was set to capture UVR exposure between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silicon rubber imprints of the skin at the back of the hand were taken to measure past environmental UVR exposure. 15 Microtopography is one of the most common and reliable methods for examining cumulative sun exposure; casts were prepared according to standard procedures using kits from Affinis (C6601, Coltène, OH, USA) and graded from 1 to 6 by the Beagley-Gibson system. 15 Day-to-day environmental UVR exposure for all participants during the first 60 days of the study was measured using a wrist dosimeter (Scienterra Limited, Otago, New Zealand) that was set to capture UVR exposure between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating an individual’s lifetime UV radiation exposure can be challenging [ 9 ] in the clinical setting, as it requires information on (1) the frequency and duration of UV exposures which can vary over a person’s lifetime, and (2) the residential history, since UV index varies by geographic location. In the research setting, data on (1) has been gathered through face-to-face [ 3 , 5 , 6 , 10 – 15 ] or telephone interviews, [ 16 , 17 ] which can take 45 min just to collect sun exposure-related variables, [ 13 ] and is too time-consuming for a fast paced dermatology clinic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data assessed with the help of standardized questionnaires regarding constitutional factors and UV exposure behaviour have been found to be highly reliable . According to published meta‐analyses, phenotypic characteristics related to the risk of CM include clinically atypical nevi, actinic skin damage and skin photo type .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,13 Data assessed with the help of standardized questionnaires regarding constitutional factors and UV exposure behaviour have been found to be highly reliable. 14 According to published meta-analyses, phenotypic characteristics related to the risk of CM include clinically atypical nevi, actinic skin damage and skin photo type. 15,16 Likewise, UV-related risk factors for CM are intermittent sun exposure and history of sunburns, 17 whereas continuous sun exposure may be protective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%